Acute knee trauma: How many plain film views are necessary for the initial examination?

Scott D. Gray, Phoebe A. Kaplan*, Robert G. Dussault, Reed A. Omary, Scott E. Campbell, Howard B. Chrisman, Stephen F. Futterer, James K. McGraw, Theodore E. Keats, Bruce J. Hillman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the knee are equivalent to four views in acute fracture detection. Design. Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively interpreted the plain film knee examinations of each patient, establishing ground truth for the presence or absence of a fracture. Cases were presented to four masked senior radiology residents twice - once as a two-view study and again as a four-view study - with 4 weeks separating the two reading sessions to minimize recall bias. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance were calculated. Patients. Ninety-two patients presenting to the emergency department with acute knee trauma were evaluated with at least a four-view plain film examination. Results and conclusions. Mean sensitivity for fracture detection using four views (85%) was significantly higher than that using two views (79%). Mean specificity and receiver operating characteristic curve areas were not significantly different using two or four views. Four views are more sensitive than AP and lateral views alone in detection of acute knee fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-302
Number of pages5
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1997

Keywords

  • Fracture
  • Knee injury
  • Plain film
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Acute knee trauma: How many plain film views are necessary for the initial examination?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this