TY - JOUR
T1 - Adapting a patient–reported outcome bookmarking task to be accessible to adults with cognitive and language disorders
AU - Cohen, Matthew L.
AU - Harnish, Stacy M.
AU - Lanzi, Alyssa M.
AU - Brello, Jennifer
AU - Victorson, David
AU - Kisala, Pamela A.
AU - Nandakumar, Ratna
AU - Tulsky, David S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation under Grant GBMF #5299 to M. L. C. The authors would like to thank Hope Morrison, Teresa Highberger, Mariah Graham, Autumn Brown, Kiera Gran, and Haley Robinson for their hard work and contributions to this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures produce scores that do not always have obvious clinical meaning. The PRO-bookmarking procedure is a new and promising way to make PRO measures more meaningful and interpretable. However, the materials and procedures of the task may benefit from adaptations to be more accessible to individuals with cognitive and language disorders. Aims: This study aims to provide an overview of the iterative refinement process used to modify the materials and procedures of the PRO-bookmarking task so that they are more accessible to adults with acquired cognitive and language impairments. Method and Procedures: Our team of health psychologists, neuropsychologists, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducted two focus groups with SLPs and care partners of people with aphasia using the same PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures as previous reports. These PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures were then refined iteratively based on discussion with those who participated in focus groups and among the research team, and three more times in the course of 16 additional focus groups of different stakeholders: people with Parkinson’s disease, aphasia, or traumatic brain injury; care partners of people with those conditions; and SLPs who have experience with those, and other adult-acquired conditions. Outcomes and Results: The PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures underwent four iterations to make them clearer, simpler, and more accessible. For example, the materials included more structured text and graphic supports where appropriate and the procedures were clustered into smaller discrete tasks and displayed graphically when possible and appropriate. Conclusions: PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures were made simpler and more structured to increase their accessibility to adults with cognitive and language impairments. In fact, these adaptations made the tasks simpler and clearer for all types of stakeholders.
AB - Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures produce scores that do not always have obvious clinical meaning. The PRO-bookmarking procedure is a new and promising way to make PRO measures more meaningful and interpretable. However, the materials and procedures of the task may benefit from adaptations to be more accessible to individuals with cognitive and language disorders. Aims: This study aims to provide an overview of the iterative refinement process used to modify the materials and procedures of the PRO-bookmarking task so that they are more accessible to adults with acquired cognitive and language impairments. Method and Procedures: Our team of health psychologists, neuropsychologists, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducted two focus groups with SLPs and care partners of people with aphasia using the same PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures as previous reports. These PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures were then refined iteratively based on discussion with those who participated in focus groups and among the research team, and three more times in the course of 16 additional focus groups of different stakeholders: people with Parkinson’s disease, aphasia, or traumatic brain injury; care partners of people with those conditions; and SLPs who have experience with those, and other adult-acquired conditions. Outcomes and Results: The PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures underwent four iterations to make them clearer, simpler, and more accessible. For example, the materials included more structured text and graphic supports where appropriate and the procedures were clustered into smaller discrete tasks and displayed graphically when possible and appropriate. Conclusions: PRO-bookmarking materials and procedures were made simpler and more structured to increase their accessibility to adults with cognitive and language impairments. In fact, these adaptations made the tasks simpler and clearer for all types of stakeholders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121289627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121289627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00071
DO - 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00071
M3 - Article
C2 - 34699261
AN - SCOPUS:85121289627
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 64
SP - 4403
EP - 4412
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 11
ER -