Adding Insult to Injury: The Justification Frame in Official Narratives of Officer-Involved Killings

Traci Burch*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article identifies the justification frame as a common narrative used by public officials to justify the use of lethal force by police. Officials deploy the justification frame to obfuscate the use of force or claim that victims posed a threat to officers in order to justify civilian deaths. I examine initial statements given in the aftermath of officer-involved deaths in 2016, focusing on incidents where an on-duty officer used force against victims who did not pose a threat when they were killed. I find that elements of the justification frame appear frequently in the explanations issued after these incidents. Statements about Black decedents are more likely to deploy the justification frame.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-384
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2022

Keywords

  • Police use of force
  • Race and policing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adding Insult to Injury: The Justification Frame in Official Narratives of Officer-Involved Killings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this