Adolescent Social Media Use and Mental Health in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes Study

Courtney K. Blackwell*, Maxwell Mansolf, Theda Rose, Sarah Pila, David Cella, Alyssa Cohen, Leslie D. Leve, Monica McGrath, Jenae M. Neiderhiser, Audrey Urquhart, Jody M. Ganiban

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Research on adolescent social media use focuses on negative mental health outcomes, with less attention on potential positive outcomes. The current study addresses this limitation by investigating associations between adolescent social media use and both psychological well-being and psychopathology. Methods: Three US-based pediatric cohort sites participating in the National Institutes of Health Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes study contributed cross-sectional survey data. Adolescents (13–18 years) self-reported the time spent and type of (active, passive) social media use, and their psychological well-being (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Life Satisfaction and Meaning and Purpose), psychopathology (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and PROMIS Depressive Symptoms), and peer relationship quality (PROMIS Peer Relationships). We estimated associations between social media use and 4 mental health groups aligned to the dual factor model of mental health (high well-being/low psychopathology; high well-being/high psychopathology; low well-being/low psychopathology; low well-being/high psychopathology), and tested interactions with peer relationships. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and family income. Results: Participants (N = 963) were sociodemographically diverse (22% income ≤130% federal poverty level; 42% adolescents of color). Elastic net regressions revealed more hours using social media increased the probability of being in the high psychopathology/low well-being group; adolescents with poor peer relationships spending ≥7 hours/day on social media had the greatest risk of poor mental health. Positive peer relationships were the strongest predictor of positive mental health. Discussion: Peer relationships were the most meaningful contribution to adolescent mental health, and quality of social media use had little influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-656
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume76
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, under Award Numbers U2COD023375 (Coordinating Center), U24OD023382 (Data Analysis Center), U24OD023319 with co-funding from the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research (Measurement Core), U24OD035523 (Laboratory Core), UH3OD023332 (Clancy Blair, Leonardo Trasande), UG3/UH3OD023282 (James Gern), and UG3/UH3OD023389 (Leslie Leve, Jody Ganiban, Jenae Neiderhiser). For a complete list of funding for the ECHO Cohort Consortium, see Appendix. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Mental health
  • Social media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adolescent Social Media Use and Mental Health in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this