Advance care planning in older adults with CKD: Patient, care partner, and clinician perspectives

Keren Ladin*, Isabel Neckermann, Noah D'Arcangelo, Susan Koch-Weser, John B. Wong, Elisa J. Gordon, Ana Rossi, Dena Rifkin, Tamara Isakova, Daniel E. Weiner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Older patients with advanced CKD are at high risk for serious complications and death, yet few discuss advance care planning (ACP) with their kidney clinicians. Examining barriers and facilitators to ACP among such patients might help identify patient-centered opportunities for improvement. Methods In semistructured interviews in March through August 2019 with purposively sampled patients (aged ≥70 years, CKD stages 4-5, nondialysis), care partners, and clinicians at clinics in across the United States, participants described discussions, factors contributing to ACP completion or avoidance, and perceived value of ACP. We used thematic analysis to analyze data. Results We conducted 68 semistructured interviews with 23 patients, 19 care partners, and 26 clinicians. Only seven of 26 (27%) clinicians routinely discussedACP.About half of the patients had documentedACP, mostly outside the health care system. We found divergent ACP definitions and perspectives; kidney clinicians largely defined ACP as completion of formal documentation, whereas patients viewed it more holistically, wanting discussions about goals, prognosis, and disease trajectory. Clinicians avoided ACP with patients from minority groups, perceiving cultural or religious barriers. Four themes and subthemes informing variation in decisions to discuss ACP and approaches emerged: (1) role ambiguity and responsibility for ACP, (2) questioning the value of ACP, (3) confronting institutional barriers (time, training, reimbursement, and the electronic medical record, EMR), and (4) consequences of avoiding ACP (disparities in ACP access and overconfidence that patients' wishes are known). Conclusions Patients, care partners, and clinicians hold discordant views about the responsibility for discussing ACP and the scope for it. This presents critical barriers to the process, leaving ACP insufficiently discussed with older adults with advanced CKD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1527-1535
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advance care planning in older adults with CKD: Patient, care partner, and clinician perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this