Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking

Neal Roese*, Taekyun Hur

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Scopus citations


Two experiments suggested differential determinants of the activation versus content of counterfactual thinking. Activation refers to whether counterfactuals consciously come to mind and was assessed by thought-listing and response-latency measures. Content refers to which antecedent forms the basis of the counterfactual and was assessed using categorical codings of thought-listings. Counterfactual activation was facilitated by negative as opposed to positive outcomes, and this effect was mediated by affective experience. Expectancy violation did not influence counterfactual activation. Normality (whether an outcome was preceded by exceptional versus normal events) had no effect on activation, but it did influence content in such a way that counterfactuals more often mutated exceptional than normal antecedents. These findings are consistent with a functionalist depiction of counterfactual thinking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-290
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Cognition
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this