Aggregating with reason(s)

Fabrizio Cariani*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Judgment aggregation is naturally applied to the modeling of collective attitudes. In the individual case, we represent agents as having not just beliefs, but also as supporting them with reasons. Can the Judgment Aggregation help model a concept of collective reason? I argue that the resources of the standard judgment aggregation framework are insufficiently general. I develop a generalization of the framework that improves along this dimension. In the new framework, new aggregation rules become available, as well as a natural account of collective reasons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3123-3147
Number of pages25
JournalSynthese
Volume190
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Keywords

  • Collective belief
  • Judgment aggregation
  • Reasons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Aggregating with reason(s)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this