Aiming at Aptness

Jennifer Lackey, Joshua Schechter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper discusses Ernest Sosa's account of knowledge and epistemic normativity. The paper has two main parts. The first part identifies places where Sosa's account requires supplementation if it is going to capture important epistemic phenomena. In particular, additional theoretical resources are needed to explain (i) the way in which epistemic aims are genuinely good aims, and (ii) the way in which some forms of reasoning can be epistemically better than others even when they are equally conducive to attaining the truth. The second part focuses on Sosa's claim that there is a kind of belief - judgmental belief - that doesn't merely aim at truth but also aims at aptness, and that this kind of belief is central to our mental lives. The paper raises several concerns about this part of Sosa's account, including the concern that aiming at aptness is overly self-directed, and so is more closely tied to vice than epistemic virtue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-452
Number of pages15
JournalEpisteme
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ernest Sosa
  • aptness
  • epistemic agency
  • epistemic normativity
  • judgmental belief
  • knowledge
  • knowledge full well
  • performance normativity
  • virtue epistemology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Aiming at Aptness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this