Aligning institutional priorities: Engaging house staff in a quality improvement and safety initiative to fulfill Clinical Learning Environment Review objectives and electronic medical record Meaningful Use requirements

Meghan R. Flanagan*, Carolyn C. Foster, Anneliese Schleyer, Gene N. Peterson, Samuel P. Mandell, Kristina E. Rudd, Byron D. Joyner, Thomas H. Payne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background House staff quality improvement projects are often not aligned with training institution priorities. House staff are the primary users of inpatient problem lists in academic medical centers, and list maintenance has significant patient safety and financial implications. Improvement of the problem list is an important objective for hospitals with electronic health records under the Meaningful Use program. Methods House staff surveys were used to create an electronic problem list manager (PLM) tool enabling efficient problem list updating. Number of new problems added and house staff perceptions of the problem list were compared before and after PLM intervention. Results The PLM was used by 654 house staff after release. Surveys demonstrated increased problem list updating (P =.002; response rate 47%). Mean new problems added per day increased from 64 pre-PLM to 125 post-PLM (P <.001). Conclusions This innovative project serves as a model for successful engagement of house staff in institutional quality and safety initiatives with tangible institutional benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-397
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume211
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Internship and Residency
Quality Improvement
Learning
Safety
Patient Safety
Inpatients
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Clinical Learning Environment Review
  • Electronic medical record
  • House staff
  • Inpatient problem list
  • Meaningful Use
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Flanagan, Meghan R. ; Foster, Carolyn C. ; Schleyer, Anneliese ; Peterson, Gene N. ; Mandell, Samuel P. ; Rudd, Kristina E. ; Joyner, Byron D. ; Payne, Thomas H. / Aligning institutional priorities : Engaging house staff in a quality improvement and safety initiative to fulfill Clinical Learning Environment Review objectives and electronic medical record Meaningful Use requirements. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 211, No. 2. pp. 390-397.
@article{ecb27a2963a144729432c753a2cc7568,
title = "Aligning institutional priorities: Engaging house staff in a quality improvement and safety initiative to fulfill Clinical Learning Environment Review objectives and electronic medical record Meaningful Use requirements",
abstract = "Background House staff quality improvement projects are often not aligned with training institution priorities. House staff are the primary users of inpatient problem lists in academic medical centers, and list maintenance has significant patient safety and financial implications. Improvement of the problem list is an important objective for hospitals with electronic health records under the Meaningful Use program. Methods House staff surveys were used to create an electronic problem list manager (PLM) tool enabling efficient problem list updating. Number of new problems added and house staff perceptions of the problem list were compared before and after PLM intervention. Results The PLM was used by 654 house staff after release. Surveys demonstrated increased problem list updating (P =.002; response rate 47{\%}). Mean new problems added per day increased from 64 pre-PLM to 125 post-PLM (P <.001). Conclusions This innovative project serves as a model for successful engagement of house staff in institutional quality and safety initiatives with tangible institutional benefits.",
keywords = "Clinical Learning Environment Review, Electronic medical record, House staff, Inpatient problem list, Meaningful Use, Quality improvement",
author = "Flanagan, {Meghan R.} and Foster, {Carolyn C.} and Anneliese Schleyer and Peterson, {Gene N.} and Mandell, {Samuel P.} and Rudd, {Kristina E.} and Joyner, {Byron D.} and Payne, {Thomas H.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
pages = "390--397",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Aligning institutional priorities : Engaging house staff in a quality improvement and safety initiative to fulfill Clinical Learning Environment Review objectives and electronic medical record Meaningful Use requirements. / Flanagan, Meghan R.; Foster, Carolyn C.; Schleyer, Anneliese; Peterson, Gene N.; Mandell, Samuel P.; Rudd, Kristina E.; Joyner, Byron D.; Payne, Thomas H.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 211, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 390-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning institutional priorities

T2 - Engaging house staff in a quality improvement and safety initiative to fulfill Clinical Learning Environment Review objectives and electronic medical record Meaningful Use requirements

AU - Flanagan, Meghan R.

AU - Foster, Carolyn C.

AU - Schleyer, Anneliese

AU - Peterson, Gene N.

AU - Mandell, Samuel P.

AU - Rudd, Kristina E.

AU - Joyner, Byron D.

AU - Payne, Thomas H.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background House staff quality improvement projects are often not aligned with training institution priorities. House staff are the primary users of inpatient problem lists in academic medical centers, and list maintenance has significant patient safety and financial implications. Improvement of the problem list is an important objective for hospitals with electronic health records under the Meaningful Use program. Methods House staff surveys were used to create an electronic problem list manager (PLM) tool enabling efficient problem list updating. Number of new problems added and house staff perceptions of the problem list were compared before and after PLM intervention. Results The PLM was used by 654 house staff after release. Surveys demonstrated increased problem list updating (P =.002; response rate 47%). Mean new problems added per day increased from 64 pre-PLM to 125 post-PLM (P <.001). Conclusions This innovative project serves as a model for successful engagement of house staff in institutional quality and safety initiatives with tangible institutional benefits.

AB - Background House staff quality improvement projects are often not aligned with training institution priorities. House staff are the primary users of inpatient problem lists in academic medical centers, and list maintenance has significant patient safety and financial implications. Improvement of the problem list is an important objective for hospitals with electronic health records under the Meaningful Use program. Methods House staff surveys were used to create an electronic problem list manager (PLM) tool enabling efficient problem list updating. Number of new problems added and house staff perceptions of the problem list were compared before and after PLM intervention. Results The PLM was used by 654 house staff after release. Surveys demonstrated increased problem list updating (P =.002; response rate 47%). Mean new problems added per day increased from 64 pre-PLM to 125 post-PLM (P <.001). Conclusions This innovative project serves as a model for successful engagement of house staff in institutional quality and safety initiatives with tangible institutional benefits.

KW - Clinical Learning Environment Review

KW - Electronic medical record

KW - House staff

KW - Inpatient problem list

KW - Meaningful Use

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955718304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955718304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26687964

AN - SCOPUS:84955718304

VL - 211

SP - 390

EP - 397

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 2

ER -