TY - JOUR
T1 - Alignment and Accountability in Policy Design and Implementation
T2 - The Common Core State Standards and Implementation Research
AU - Coburn, Cynthia E.
AU - Hill, Heather C.
AU - Spillane, James P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © 2016 AERA.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Both the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and recent efforts to hold schools and teachers accountable have been hotly debated among practitioners, policymakers, and the public at large. Much of the debate centers on the merits and demerits of these initiatives and the general approach they represent to reforming teaching and learning. In this article, we focus on a different issue, that is, the opportunity to advance research on policy implementation afforded by the intertwined nature of CCSS and accountability efforts. Arguing that it is essential for stakeholders, regardless of their stance on either reform, to understand whether and how both influence classroom teaching and learning, we outline elements of a research agenda to generate knowledge important to the design of future instructional policies. For this to happen, we argue that an implementation research agenda needs to build on (rather than reinvent) lessons learned from the past quarter century of implementation scholarship on instructional policy. To that end, we review theoretical and empirical insights from implementation research on standards-based reform and outline specific avenues for potential theory testing research on educational policy implementation.
AB - Both the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and recent efforts to hold schools and teachers accountable have been hotly debated among practitioners, policymakers, and the public at large. Much of the debate centers on the merits and demerits of these initiatives and the general approach they represent to reforming teaching and learning. In this article, we focus on a different issue, that is, the opportunity to advance research on policy implementation afforded by the intertwined nature of CCSS and accountability efforts. Arguing that it is essential for stakeholders, regardless of their stance on either reform, to understand whether and how both influence classroom teaching and learning, we outline elements of a research agenda to generate knowledge important to the design of future instructional policies. For this to happen, we argue that an implementation research agenda needs to build on (rather than reinvent) lessons learned from the past quarter century of implementation scholarship on instructional policy. To that end, we review theoretical and empirical insights from implementation research on standards-based reform and outline specific avenues for potential theory testing research on educational policy implementation.
KW - Accountability
KW - Educational policy
KW - Policy analysis
KW - Professional development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971483978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971483978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3102/0013189X16651080
DO - 10.3102/0013189X16651080
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84971483978
SN - 0013-189X
VL - 45
SP - 243
EP - 251
JO - Educational Researcher
JF - Educational Researcher
IS - 4
ER -