America and the individual: The Hairy Ape and Machinal at the Moscow Kamerny Theatre

Dassia N. Posner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Between 1926 and 1934 the Moscow Kamerny Theatre staged a cycle of six American plays: Eugene O'Neill's The Hairy Ape, Desire under the Elms, and All God's Chillun Got Wings; Sophie Treadwell's Machinal; Rosita, a stage adaptation of a Hollywood film; and John Dos Passos's Fortune Heights. In this article Dassia N. Posner analyzes and contextualizes two of these productions: The Hairy Ape (1926) and Machinal (1933). By the mid-1920s, Kamerny Theatre director Alexander Tairov was under intense pressure to stage work that aligned with the Soviet Union's political goals. A significant portion of the Kamerny's repertoire had long consisted of foreign plays that celebrated the individual's struggle against oppression. The Hairy Ape and Machinal provided Tairov with a unique opportunity to combine artistic, political, and human relevance in a way he had not achieved before, using the artistic language of the theatre's earlier stylistic and acting innovations. Drawing on rich archival sources, Posner illuminates ways in which stylistic juxtaposition allowed these productions to address a specific political context while also reflecting on oppression more broadly as it relates to class, gender, national origin, artistic freedom, and individual thought.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalNew Theatre Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Keywords

  • Alexander Tairov
  • Alisa Koonen
  • Constructivism
  • Eugene O'Neill
  • Expressionism
  • Pantomime
  • Political theatre
  • Sophie Treadwell
  • Soviet theatre
  • Stenberg Brothers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'America and the individual: The Hairy Ape and Machinal at the Moscow Kamerny Theatre'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this