American federalism and racial formation in contemporary immigration policy: a processual analysis of Alabama’s HB56

Jennifer A. Jones*, Hana E. Brown

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Racialization scholarship identifies the state as a primary site of racial formation. Most of this research envisions the state as a uniform entity, with race-making occurring at a single level of political action. Analysing Latino racialization in immigration debates in Alabama, we argue that state-driven racialization occurs at multiple levels of governance. Although Alabama’s 2011 HB56 is widely recognized as state-enforced Latino racialization, we find that the bill resulted from mutually reinforcing racialization practices and policies that played out at multiple levels of immigration governance. These findings not only present a revisionist history of HB56, they suggest that any account of states and racialization requires a nuanced and complex understanding of the state, its institutional structure, and its operations. Individual state institutions may do different work as race makers, but race-making efforts by federal, state, and local actors interact to produce both racialized subjects and racial hierarchies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-551
Number of pages21
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 12 2019

Funding

This work was supported by Russell Sage Foundation [88-14-05]; University of Notre Dame [Institute for Scholarship in the Liberal Arts Bi-A]; Wake Forest University [Wake Forest University Collaborative Pilot Grant].

Keywords

  • Alabama
  • federalism
  • Immigration
  • immigration policy
  • Latinos
  • racialization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'American federalism and racial formation in contemporary immigration policy: a processual analysis of Alabama’s HB56'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this