America's Best Medical Schools: A Renewed Critique of the U.S. News & World Report Rankings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This Invited Commentary amplifies the continuing critique of the U.S. News & World Report rankings of U.S. medical schools and academic medical centers. The article begins with a critical quote about the medical school rankings published in this journal nearly 20 years ago and points out that little has changed in nearly two decades. The author then reports how the flawed rankings are performed and why U.S. medical school rankings are taken seriously, addresses the varied missions of U.S. medical schools, describes what really matters for success in medical school and professional life, sets a path forward to improve methods of medical school evaluation, and speaks to the irony of dismissing the rankings while still using them for marketing and fund-raising. The article concludes with a critical argument about the U.S. News & World Report rankings not only of medical schools but also of schools across the learned professions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1264-1266
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Volume94
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

ranking
news
school
irony
marketing
profession
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{6901c0717e0f49bca7a755e56526cce2,
title = "America's Best Medical Schools: A Renewed Critique of the U.S. News & World Report Rankings",
abstract = "This Invited Commentary amplifies the continuing critique of the U.S. News & World Report rankings of U.S. medical schools and academic medical centers. The article begins with a critical quote about the medical school rankings published in this journal nearly 20 years ago and points out that little has changed in nearly two decades. The author then reports how the flawed rankings are performed and why U.S. medical school rankings are taken seriously, addresses the varied missions of U.S. medical schools, describes what really matters for success in medical school and professional life, sets a path forward to improve methods of medical school evaluation, and speaks to the irony of dismissing the rankings while still using them for marketing and fund-raising. The article concludes with a critical argument about the U.S. News & World Report rankings not only of medical schools but also of schools across the learned professions.",
author = "McGaghie, {William C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002742",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "1264--1266",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - America's Best Medical Schools

T2 - A Renewed Critique of the U.S. News & World Report Rankings

AU - McGaghie, William C.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - This Invited Commentary amplifies the continuing critique of the U.S. News & World Report rankings of U.S. medical schools and academic medical centers. The article begins with a critical quote about the medical school rankings published in this journal nearly 20 years ago and points out that little has changed in nearly two decades. The author then reports how the flawed rankings are performed and why U.S. medical school rankings are taken seriously, addresses the varied missions of U.S. medical schools, describes what really matters for success in medical school and professional life, sets a path forward to improve methods of medical school evaluation, and speaks to the irony of dismissing the rankings while still using them for marketing and fund-raising. The article concludes with a critical argument about the U.S. News & World Report rankings not only of medical schools but also of schools across the learned professions.

AB - This Invited Commentary amplifies the continuing critique of the U.S. News & World Report rankings of U.S. medical schools and academic medical centers. The article begins with a critical quote about the medical school rankings published in this journal nearly 20 years ago and points out that little has changed in nearly two decades. The author then reports how the flawed rankings are performed and why U.S. medical school rankings are taken seriously, addresses the varied missions of U.S. medical schools, describes what really matters for success in medical school and professional life, sets a path forward to improve methods of medical school evaluation, and speaks to the irony of dismissing the rankings while still using them for marketing and fund-raising. The article concludes with a critical argument about the U.S. News & World Report rankings not only of medical schools but also of schools across the learned professions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071616277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071616277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002742

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002742

M3 - Article

C2 - 31460911

AN - SCOPUS:85071616277

VL - 94

SP - 1264

EP - 1266

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 9

ER -