Amerindians, Europeans, Makiritare, Mestizos, Puerto Rican, and Quechua: Categorical heterogeneity in Latin American human biology

Santiago José Molina*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The process by which scientists adopt and use socially constructed categories to classify their human subjects is complex. Scientists have used a wide variety of seemingly incongruous racial, ethnic, geographic, linguistic and national categories in their studies of human biological variation. This article details the epistemic rationale behind the system of classification found in mid-twentieth century human biology. The populationist rationale, I argue, entails agnosticism towards the reality of categories and supported the use of flexible standards around sampling and labeling. Looking closely at the categories used in projects in Latin America illustrates how the distinction between “primitive” and “industrialized” structured the classification system used by researchers to render populations productive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-679
Number of pages25
JournalPerspectives on Science
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Amerindians, Europeans, Makiritare, Mestizos, Puerto Rican, and Quechua: Categorical heterogeneity in Latin American human biology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this