An antibiotic order form intervention does not improve or reduce vancomycin use

Maureen K Bolon*, Alana D. Arnold, Henry A. Feldman, Donald A. Goldmann, Sharon B. Wright

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether a paper-based antibiotic ordering system is an effective antibiotic stewardship measure. Methods: An antibiotic order form (AOF) was introduced in July 2001 at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Vancomycin courses prescribed before and after the AOF introduction were retrospectively reviewed based on Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guidelines. The impact of the AOF on the appropriateness of vancomycin prescribing was evaluated in univariate and multivariable analyses that adjusted for other factors associated with appropriateness of vancomycin use. The density of vancomycin use after introduction of the AOF was also assessed. Results: Compliance with the AOF was poor (<50%) during the planned study period; therefore an additional 2 months of improved compliance (70-80%) were included. Rates of inappropriate vancomycin use increased during the study periods: 35% before AOF; 39% post-AOF; and 51% during the improved compliance period. On adjusted analysis, vancomycin utilization was significantly more inappropriate after introduction of the AOF. Vancomycin doses per 1000 patient days increased after introduction of the AOF. Conclusions: Inappropriate vancomycin use and vancomycin use overall increased after the introduction of an AOF. An AOF intervention did not have its intended effect of improving and reducing vancomycin use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1053-1058
Number of pages6
JournalPediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Vancomycin
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Compliance
Pediatric Hospitals
Advisory Committees
Tertiary Healthcare
Infection Control
Cross Infection
Tertiary Care Centers
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Drug utilization review
  • Practice guidelines
  • Vancomycin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Bolon, Maureen K ; Arnold, Alana D. ; Feldman, Henry A. ; Goldmann, Donald A. ; Wright, Sharon B. / An antibiotic order form intervention does not improve or reduce vancomycin use. In: Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 24, No. 12. pp. 1053-1058.
@article{a2973fe3a6a14a448ae0885faf5dc699,
title = "An antibiotic order form intervention does not improve or reduce vancomycin use",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine whether a paper-based antibiotic ordering system is an effective antibiotic stewardship measure. Methods: An antibiotic order form (AOF) was introduced in July 2001 at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Vancomycin courses prescribed before and after the AOF introduction were retrospectively reviewed based on Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guidelines. The impact of the AOF on the appropriateness of vancomycin prescribing was evaluated in univariate and multivariable analyses that adjusted for other factors associated with appropriateness of vancomycin use. The density of vancomycin use after introduction of the AOF was also assessed. Results: Compliance with the AOF was poor (<50{\%}) during the planned study period; therefore an additional 2 months of improved compliance (70-80{\%}) were included. Rates of inappropriate vancomycin use increased during the study periods: 35{\%} before AOF; 39{\%} post-AOF; and 51{\%} during the improved compliance period. On adjusted analysis, vancomycin utilization was significantly more inappropriate after introduction of the AOF. Vancomycin doses per 1000 patient days increased after introduction of the AOF. Conclusions: Inappropriate vancomycin use and vancomycin use overall increased after the introduction of an AOF. An AOF intervention did not have its intended effect of improving and reducing vancomycin use.",
keywords = "Drug utilization review, Practice guidelines, Vancomycin",
author = "Bolon, {Maureen K} and Arnold, {Alana D.} and Feldman, {Henry A.} and Goldmann, {Donald A.} and Wright, {Sharon B.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.inf.0000190025.61037.6c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1053--1058",
journal = "Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal",
issn = "0891-3668",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

An antibiotic order form intervention does not improve or reduce vancomycin use. / Bolon, Maureen K; Arnold, Alana D.; Feldman, Henry A.; Goldmann, Donald A.; Wright, Sharon B.

In: Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Vol. 24, No. 12, 01.01.2005, p. 1053-1058.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - An antibiotic order form intervention does not improve or reduce vancomycin use

AU - Bolon, Maureen K

AU - Arnold, Alana D.

AU - Feldman, Henry A.

AU - Goldmann, Donald A.

AU - Wright, Sharon B.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To determine whether a paper-based antibiotic ordering system is an effective antibiotic stewardship measure. Methods: An antibiotic order form (AOF) was introduced in July 2001 at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Vancomycin courses prescribed before and after the AOF introduction were retrospectively reviewed based on Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guidelines. The impact of the AOF on the appropriateness of vancomycin prescribing was evaluated in univariate and multivariable analyses that adjusted for other factors associated with appropriateness of vancomycin use. The density of vancomycin use after introduction of the AOF was also assessed. Results: Compliance with the AOF was poor (<50%) during the planned study period; therefore an additional 2 months of improved compliance (70-80%) were included. Rates of inappropriate vancomycin use increased during the study periods: 35% before AOF; 39% post-AOF; and 51% during the improved compliance period. On adjusted analysis, vancomycin utilization was significantly more inappropriate after introduction of the AOF. Vancomycin doses per 1000 patient days increased after introduction of the AOF. Conclusions: Inappropriate vancomycin use and vancomycin use overall increased after the introduction of an AOF. An AOF intervention did not have its intended effect of improving and reducing vancomycin use.

AB - Objectives: To determine whether a paper-based antibiotic ordering system is an effective antibiotic stewardship measure. Methods: An antibiotic order form (AOF) was introduced in July 2001 at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Vancomycin courses prescribed before and after the AOF introduction were retrospectively reviewed based on Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guidelines. The impact of the AOF on the appropriateness of vancomycin prescribing was evaluated in univariate and multivariable analyses that adjusted for other factors associated with appropriateness of vancomycin use. The density of vancomycin use after introduction of the AOF was also assessed. Results: Compliance with the AOF was poor (<50%) during the planned study period; therefore an additional 2 months of improved compliance (70-80%) were included. Rates of inappropriate vancomycin use increased during the study periods: 35% before AOF; 39% post-AOF; and 51% during the improved compliance period. On adjusted analysis, vancomycin utilization was significantly more inappropriate after introduction of the AOF. Vancomycin doses per 1000 patient days increased after introduction of the AOF. Conclusions: Inappropriate vancomycin use and vancomycin use overall increased after the introduction of an AOF. An AOF intervention did not have its intended effect of improving and reducing vancomycin use.

KW - Drug utilization review

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Vancomycin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29444453374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29444453374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.inf.0000190025.61037.6c

DO - 10.1097/01.inf.0000190025.61037.6c

M3 - Review article

VL - 24

SP - 1053

EP - 1058

JO - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

JF - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

SN - 0891-3668

IS - 12

ER -