TY - JOUR
T1 - An association between auditory–visual synchrony processing and reading comprehension
T2 - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
AU - Mossbridge, Julia
AU - Zweig, Jacob
AU - Grabowecky, Marcia
AU - Suzuki, Satoru
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (R01 EYO21184).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - The perceptual system integrates synchronized auditory–visual signals in part to promote individuation of objects in cluttered environments. The processing of auditory–visual synchrony may more generally contribute to cognition by synchronizing internally generated multimodal signals. Reading is a prime example because the ability to synchronize internal phonological and/or lexical processing with visual orthographic processing may facilitate encoding of words and meanings. Consistent with this possibility, developmental and clinical research has suggested a link between reading performance and the ability to compare visual spatial/temporal patterns with auditory temporal patterns. Here, we provide converging behavioral and electrophysiological evidence suggesting that greater behavioral ability to judge auditory–visual synchrony (Experiment 1) and greater sensitivity of an electrophysiological marker of auditory–visual synchrony processing (Experiment 2) both predict superior reading comprehension performance, accounting for 16% and 25% of the variance, respectively. These results support the idea that the mechanisms that detect auditory–visual synchrony contribute to reading comprehension.
AB - The perceptual system integrates synchronized auditory–visual signals in part to promote individuation of objects in cluttered environments. The processing of auditory–visual synchrony may more generally contribute to cognition by synchronizing internally generated multimodal signals. Reading is a prime example because the ability to synchronize internal phonological and/or lexical processing with visual orthographic processing may facilitate encoding of words and meanings. Consistent with this possibility, developmental and clinical research has suggested a link between reading performance and the ability to compare visual spatial/temporal patterns with auditory temporal patterns. Here, we provide converging behavioral and electrophysiological evidence suggesting that greater behavioral ability to judge auditory–visual synchrony (Experiment 1) and greater sensitivity of an electrophysiological marker of auditory–visual synchrony processing (Experiment 2) both predict superior reading comprehension performance, accounting for 16% and 25% of the variance, respectively. These results support the idea that the mechanisms that detect auditory–visual synchrony contribute to reading comprehension.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011586460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011586460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/jocn_a_01052
DO - 10.1162/jocn_a_01052
M3 - Article
C2 - 28129060
AN - SCOPUS:85011586460
SN - 0898-929X
VL - 29
SP - 435
EP - 447
JO - Journal of cognitive neuroscience
JF - Journal of cognitive neuroscience
IS - 3
ER -