An electronic health record-based strategy to increase PrEP decision-making among cisgender women in primary care: results of a randomized pilot study

Allison Prickett Pack*, Rachel O’Conor, Rosanne DiPietrantonio Vasiloff, David Liebovitz, Mary Clare Masters, Kenya Alcantara, Reneaki Smith, Guisselle Wismer, Rachel Tatz, Fangyu Yeh, Laura Marie Curtis, Scott Hur, Stacy Cooper Bailey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Approximately one in five HIV infections in the United States occurs among cisgender women, those whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective preventive option for all genders, yet lack of awareness and stigma have hindered uptake. To address this gap, we sought to develop and pilot test an electronic health record-based strategy among cisgender women in primary care. Methods: Our strategy, informed by prior work, identified cisgender women in primary care who might benefit from PrEP, provided them with person-centered PrEP educational materials via the patient portal, and offered an opportunity to electronically request a dedicated PrEP visit with a PrEP champion – a female primary care physician – if desired. We conducted two sequential patient-randomized pilot studies to test: (1) the efficacy of the materials compared to usual care, and (2) the preliminary effectiveness of our strategy compared to usual care. The primary outcomes for the efficacy study included PrEP knowledge and PrEP stigma, while the primary outcome for the preliminary effectiveness study was PrEP uptake over a three-month period. Results: In total, we enrolled 200 women. The efficacy study (n = 100, n = 50 per arm) revealed our PrEP educational materials significantly increased PrEP knowledge scores among women who were directly shown the materials, compared to those who were not (9.4 (standard deviation (SD) 0.9) vs. 5.8 (SD 1.8) out of 10, p-value < 0.01, respectively). However, the preliminary effectiveness study (n = 100, n = 50 per arm) resulted in no significant differences, other than PrEP awareness, between women randomized to our strategy and those randomized to usual care. Conclusions: PrEP educational materials have the potential to increase PrEP knowledge among cisgender women. For the patient portal to be an effective delivery channel, additional support efforts should be considered. Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov, Clinical Trial number NCT05709860 registered on 2023-01-17.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number589
JournalBMC health services research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Funding

This work was supported by funding from Merck, Sharp & Dohme, LLC (MISP Reference #100089). The work was also funded in part, by the National Institutes of Health\u2019s National Institute on Aging, Grant Number P30 AG059988. REDCap software is supported by the National Institutes of Health\u2019s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number UL1 TR001422. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent National Institutes of Health.

Keywords

  • Cisgender women
  • Patient education
  • Patient portal intervention
  • PrEP
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An electronic health record-based strategy to increase PrEP decision-making among cisgender women in primary care: results of a randomized pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this