TY - JOUR
T1 - An EMG pattern comparison of exoskeleton vs. end-effector robotic device for assisted walking training
AU - Morone, Giovanni
AU - Iosa, Marco
AU - Tamburella, Federica
AU - Muzzioli, Luca
AU - Pisotta, Iolanda
AU - Moreno, Juan C.
AU - Pons, Jose L
AU - Paolucci, Stefano
AU - Cincotti, Febo
AU - Molinari, Marco
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Gait Trainer (GT) and the Lokomat (Loko) are two commercial robotic devices developed for assist task-oriented, intensive practice of walking in neurological patients. Despite the many studies involving these devices, there are not specific studies comparing electromyography (EMG) activity during sessions of walking training performed using these devices. This study aimed to explore the differences in the EMG patterns between these two devices and in respect overground walking. EMG of eight lower limb muscles were bilaterally recorded and analyzed in one healthy subject. Thigh muscles were more active during GTsession, whereas shank muscles during Loko-session. Furthermore, decreasing the guidance assistance of Loko (i.e. the percentage of force applied by the robot in respect to that needed for following the predetermined trajectory, training), all the muscles showed an increment of the EMG signal. These results showed clear differences in muscle activation patterns between the two systems and, as expected, quite different from the pattern observed in over-ground locomotion. These results are of importance for the correct use of robotic devices in gait rehabilitation and would represent the preliminary step to address their correct use in neurologically impaired subjects.
AB - Gait Trainer (GT) and the Lokomat (Loko) are two commercial robotic devices developed for assist task-oriented, intensive practice of walking in neurological patients. Despite the many studies involving these devices, there are not specific studies comparing electromyography (EMG) activity during sessions of walking training performed using these devices. This study aimed to explore the differences in the EMG patterns between these two devices and in respect overground walking. EMG of eight lower limb muscles were bilaterally recorded and analyzed in one healthy subject. Thigh muscles were more active during GTsession, whereas shank muscles during Loko-session. Furthermore, decreasing the guidance assistance of Loko (i.e. the percentage of force applied by the robot in respect to that needed for following the predetermined trajectory, training), all the muscles showed an increment of the EMG signal. These results showed clear differences in muscle activation patterns between the two systems and, as expected, quite different from the pattern observed in over-ground locomotion. These results are of importance for the correct use of robotic devices in gait rehabilitation and would represent the preliminary step to address their correct use in neurologically impaired subjects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018732142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018732142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_82
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_82
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018732142
VL - 7
SP - 563
EP - 567
JO - Biosystems and Biorobotics
JF - Biosystems and Biorobotics
SN - 2195-3562
ER -