An Empirical National Assessment of the Learning Environment and Factors Associated with Program Culture

Ryan J. Ellis, D. Brock Hewitt, Yue-Yung Hu, Julie Johnson, Ryan Patrick Merkow, Anthony D Yang, John R. Potts, David B. Hoyt, Jo Buyske, Karl Y Bilimoria*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To empirically describe surgical residency program culture and assess program characteristics associated with program culture. Summary Background Data: Despite concerns about the impact of the learning environment on trainees, empirical data have not been available to examine and compare program-level differences in residency culture. Methods: Following the 2018 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all US general surgery residents. Survey items were analyzed using principal component analysis to derive composite measures of program culture. Associations between program characteristics and composite measures of culture were assessed. Results: Analysis included 7387 residents at 260 training programs (99.3% response rate). Principal component analysis suggested that program culture may be described by 2 components: Wellness and Negative Exposures. Twenty-six programs (10.0%) were in the worst quartile for both Wellness and Negative Exposure components. These programs had significantly higher rates of duty hour violations (23.3% vs 11.1%), verbal/physical abuse (41.6% vs 28.6%), gender discrimination (78.7% vs 64.5%), sexual harassment (30.8% vs 16.7%), burnout (54.9% vs 35.0%), and thoughts of attrition (21.6% vs 10.8%; all P < 0.001). Being in the worst quartile of both components was associated with percentage of female residents in the program (P = 0.011), but not program location, academic affiliation, size, or faculty demographics. Conclusions: Residency culture was characterized by poor resident wellness and frequent negative exposures and was generally not associated with structural program characteristics. Additional qualitative and quantitative studies are needed to explore unmeasured local social dynamics that may underlie measured differences in program culture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Learning
Principal Component Analysis
Sexual Harassment
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Education

Keywords

  • duty hours
  • general surgery
  • residency
  • training environment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{e418adad092c44ce84c5d18a78123155,
title = "An Empirical National Assessment of the Learning Environment and Factors Associated with Program Culture",
abstract = "Objectives: To empirically describe surgical residency program culture and assess program characteristics associated with program culture. Summary Background Data: Despite concerns about the impact of the learning environment on trainees, empirical data have not been available to examine and compare program-level differences in residency culture. Methods: Following the 2018 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all US general surgery residents. Survey items were analyzed using principal component analysis to derive composite measures of program culture. Associations between program characteristics and composite measures of culture were assessed. Results: Analysis included 7387 residents at 260 training programs (99.3{\%} response rate). Principal component analysis suggested that program culture may be described by 2 components: Wellness and Negative Exposures. Twenty-six programs (10.0{\%}) were in the worst quartile for both Wellness and Negative Exposure components. These programs had significantly higher rates of duty hour violations (23.3{\%} vs 11.1{\%}), verbal/physical abuse (41.6{\%} vs 28.6{\%}), gender discrimination (78.7{\%} vs 64.5{\%}), sexual harassment (30.8{\%} vs 16.7{\%}), burnout (54.9{\%} vs 35.0{\%}), and thoughts of attrition (21.6{\%} vs 10.8{\%}; all P < 0.001). Being in the worst quartile of both components was associated with percentage of female residents in the program (P = 0.011), but not program location, academic affiliation, size, or faculty demographics. Conclusions: Residency culture was characterized by poor resident wellness and frequent negative exposures and was generally not associated with structural program characteristics. Additional qualitative and quantitative studies are needed to explore unmeasured local social dynamics that may underlie measured differences in program culture.",
keywords = "duty hours, general surgery, residency, training environment",
author = "Ellis, {Ryan J.} and Hewitt, {D. Brock} and Yue-Yung Hu and Julie Johnson and Merkow, {Ryan Patrick} and Yang, {Anthony D} and Potts, {John R.} and Hoyt, {David B.} and Jo Buyske and Bilimoria, {Karl Y}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000003545",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

An Empirical National Assessment of the Learning Environment and Factors Associated with Program Culture. / Ellis, Ryan J.; Hewitt, D. Brock; Hu, Yue-Yung; Johnson, Julie; Merkow, Ryan Patrick; Yang, Anthony D; Potts, John R.; Hoyt, David B.; Buyske, Jo; Bilimoria, Karl Y.

In: Annals of surgery, 01.01.2019, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Empirical National Assessment of the Learning Environment and Factors Associated with Program Culture

AU - Ellis, Ryan J.

AU - Hewitt, D. Brock

AU - Hu, Yue-Yung

AU - Johnson, Julie

AU - Merkow, Ryan Patrick

AU - Yang, Anthony D

AU - Potts, John R.

AU - Hoyt, David B.

AU - Buyske, Jo

AU - Bilimoria, Karl Y

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To empirically describe surgical residency program culture and assess program characteristics associated with program culture. Summary Background Data: Despite concerns about the impact of the learning environment on trainees, empirical data have not been available to examine and compare program-level differences in residency culture. Methods: Following the 2018 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all US general surgery residents. Survey items were analyzed using principal component analysis to derive composite measures of program culture. Associations between program characteristics and composite measures of culture were assessed. Results: Analysis included 7387 residents at 260 training programs (99.3% response rate). Principal component analysis suggested that program culture may be described by 2 components: Wellness and Negative Exposures. Twenty-six programs (10.0%) were in the worst quartile for both Wellness and Negative Exposure components. These programs had significantly higher rates of duty hour violations (23.3% vs 11.1%), verbal/physical abuse (41.6% vs 28.6%), gender discrimination (78.7% vs 64.5%), sexual harassment (30.8% vs 16.7%), burnout (54.9% vs 35.0%), and thoughts of attrition (21.6% vs 10.8%; all P < 0.001). Being in the worst quartile of both components was associated with percentage of female residents in the program (P = 0.011), but not program location, academic affiliation, size, or faculty demographics. Conclusions: Residency culture was characterized by poor resident wellness and frequent negative exposures and was generally not associated with structural program characteristics. Additional qualitative and quantitative studies are needed to explore unmeasured local social dynamics that may underlie measured differences in program culture.

AB - Objectives: To empirically describe surgical residency program culture and assess program characteristics associated with program culture. Summary Background Data: Despite concerns about the impact of the learning environment on trainees, empirical data have not been available to examine and compare program-level differences in residency culture. Methods: Following the 2018 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all US general surgery residents. Survey items were analyzed using principal component analysis to derive composite measures of program culture. Associations between program characteristics and composite measures of culture were assessed. Results: Analysis included 7387 residents at 260 training programs (99.3% response rate). Principal component analysis suggested that program culture may be described by 2 components: Wellness and Negative Exposures. Twenty-six programs (10.0%) were in the worst quartile for both Wellness and Negative Exposure components. These programs had significantly higher rates of duty hour violations (23.3% vs 11.1%), verbal/physical abuse (41.6% vs 28.6%), gender discrimination (78.7% vs 64.5%), sexual harassment (30.8% vs 16.7%), burnout (54.9% vs 35.0%), and thoughts of attrition (21.6% vs 10.8%; all P < 0.001). Being in the worst quartile of both components was associated with percentage of female residents in the program (P = 0.011), but not program location, academic affiliation, size, or faculty demographics. Conclusions: Residency culture was characterized by poor resident wellness and frequent negative exposures and was generally not associated with structural program characteristics. Additional qualitative and quantitative studies are needed to explore unmeasured local social dynamics that may underlie measured differences in program culture.

KW - duty hours

KW - general surgery

KW - residency

KW - training environment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070737346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070737346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003545

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003545

M3 - Article

C2 - 31425291

AN - SCOPUS:85070737346

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

ER -