An integrated reasoning approach to moral decision-making

Morteza Dehghani*, Emmett Tomai, Kenneth D Forbus, Matthew Klenk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present a computational model, MoralDM, which integrates several Al techniques in order to model recent psychological findings on moral decision-making. Current theories of moral decision-making extend beyond pure utilitarian models by relying on contextual factors that vary with culture. MoralDM uses a natural language system to produce formal representations from psychological stimuli, to reduce tailorability. The impacts of secular versus sacred values are modeled via qualitative reasoning, using an order of magnitude representation. MoralDM uses a combination of first-principles reasoning and analogical reasoning to determine consequences and utilities when making moral judgments. We describe how MoralDM works and shew that it can model psychological results and improve its performance via accumulating examples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAAAI-08/IAAI-08 Proceedings - 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 20th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference
Pages1280-1286
Number of pages7
StatePublished - Dec 23 2008
Event23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 20th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, AAAI-08/IAAI-08 - Chicago, IL, United States
Duration: Jul 13 2008Jul 17 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Volume3

Other

Other23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 20th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, AAAI-08/IAAI-08
CountryUnited States
CityChicago, IL
Period7/13/087/17/08

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An integrated reasoning approach to moral decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this