Analogical Reasoning, Generalization, and Rule Learning for Common Law Reasoning

Joseph Blass, Kenneth D. Forbus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research in AI & Law has sought to model common-law case-based reasoning by creating analogies from cases, extracting and applying rules from cases, or both. This paper presents a new approach to extracting legal information from cases and several methods to apply it to new cases, including by analogy and by conversion to logical rules. It evaluates the approaches on a dataset of real-world cases and compares the results to off-the-shelf machine-learning techniques. We conclude that abstract legal information can be extracted from similar cases through analogical generalization, and that the extracted legal schemas can be used to reason about and solve other cases both by analogy and by rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Proceedings of the Conference
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages32-41
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9798400701979
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 19 2023
Event19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Braga, Portugal
Duration: Jun 19 2023Jun 23 2023

Publication series

Name19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Proceedings of the Conference

Conference

Conference19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityBraga
Period6/19/236/23/23

Funding

This research was supported by the Computational Cognition and Machine Intelligence Program of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award #FA9550-20-1-0091.

Keywords

  • Analogy
  • Legal Schemas
  • Precedential Reasoning
  • Rule Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analogical Reasoning, Generalization, and Rule Learning for Common Law Reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this