Abstract
Powered prosthetic legs can improve the quality of life for people with transfemoral amputations by providing net positive work at the knee and ankle, reducing the effort required from the wearer, and making more tasks possible. However, the controllers for these devices use finite state machines that limit their use to a small set of pre-defined tasks that require many hours of tuning for each user. In previous work, we demonstrated that a continuous parameterization of joint kinematics over walking speeds and inclines provides more accurate predictions of reference kinematics for control than a finite state machine. However, our previous work did not account for measurement errors in gait phase, walking speed, and ground incline, nor subject-specific differences in reference kinematics, which occur in practice. In this work, we conduct a pilot experiment to characterize the accuracy of speed and incline measurements using sensors onboard our prototype prosthetic leg and simulate phase measurements on ten able-bodied subjects using archived motion capture data. Our analysis shows that given demonstrated accuracy for speed, incline, and phase estimation, a continuous parameterization provides statistically significantly better predictions of knee and ankle kinematics than a comparable finite state machine, but both methods' primary source of predictive error is subject deviation from average kinematics.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 9294128 |
Pages (from-to) | 262-272 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering |
Volume | 29 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Funding
Manuscript received July 22, 2020; revised December 3, 2020; accepted December 11, 2020. Date of publication December 15, 2020; date of current version March 1, 2021. This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the NIH under Award R01HD094772, and in part by NSF under Award CMMI-1637704 and Award 1854898. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NSF. Robert D. Gregg, IV, Ph.D., holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Welcome Fund. (Corresponding author: Kyle R. Embry.) Kyle R. Embry is with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). The authors thank Corey Powell of the University of Michigan CSCAR team for statistical consultation, Toby Elery for help with the powered prosthetic leg experiments, and Lizbeth Zamora for help with processing experimental data. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NSF. Robert D. Gregg, IV, Ph.D., holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
Keywords
- Human locomotion
- optimization
- predictive models
- prosthetic limbs
- robot control
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Internal Medicine
- General Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation