TY - JOUR
T1 - Analyzing Active Fund Managers' Commitment to ESG
T2 - Evidence from the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment
AU - Kim, Soohun
AU - Yoon, Aaron
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Hans Christensen, Robert Eccles, Caroline Flammer, Paul Griffin (discussant), Ravi Jagannathan, Robert Korajczyk, Sangwook Nam, Andreas Neuhierl, Feng Tian (discussant), Beverly Walther, and a number of anonymous asset managers as well as seminar participants at the 2020 Korean Accounting Association Summer International Conference, the 2020 Conference on Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, the 2021 China Academy of Financial Research Conference, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Georgetown University, Illinois Young Scholars Research Symposium, Korea Securities Association Conference, Northwestern University, Stanford University, the 2021 Frontiers in Development Policy Conference, and University of Victoria for very helpful discussions. The authors also thank Sustainalytics and TruValue Labs for generously providing the ESG data. All errors are their sole responsibility. This paper received the Deloitte Research Award from the Korean Accounting Association.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2022 INFORMS.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is the largest global environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiative in the asset-management industry to date. We analyze what happens after active U.S. mutual funds sign the PRI to assess whether they exhibit ESG implementation. We find that PRI signatories attract a large fund inflow, but we do not observe improvements in fund-level ESG scores or fund returns. We consider a battery of ways to proxy for funds' ESG incorporation (e.g., entry/exit, screening, engagement, voting for pro-ESG proposals), but fail to observe evidence of meaningful on average follow-through. Next, we explore cross-sectional fund characteristics and find that only quant funds exhibit small improvements in ESG performance versus other funds, mainly through buying high-ESG-performing stocks. Furthermore, we note that signatories are not superior performers in ESG issues prior to joining the PRI relative to non-PRI funds, but PRI affiliation tends to be widely advertised on company websites, marketing materials, and fund documents. Overall, a reasonable reader may perceive our findings as consistent with PRI funds' greenwashing. We note, however, that what we uncover is based only on outcome-based measures and may miss some actual efforts of signatories.
AB - The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is the largest global environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiative in the asset-management industry to date. We analyze what happens after active U.S. mutual funds sign the PRI to assess whether they exhibit ESG implementation. We find that PRI signatories attract a large fund inflow, but we do not observe improvements in fund-level ESG scores or fund returns. We consider a battery of ways to proxy for funds' ESG incorporation (e.g., entry/exit, screening, engagement, voting for pro-ESG proposals), but fail to observe evidence of meaningful on average follow-through. Next, we explore cross-sectional fund characteristics and find that only quant funds exhibit small improvements in ESG performance versus other funds, mainly through buying high-ESG-performing stocks. Furthermore, we note that signatories are not superior performers in ESG issues prior to joining the PRI relative to non-PRI funds, but PRI affiliation tends to be widely advertised on company websites, marketing materials, and fund documents. Overall, a reasonable reader may perceive our findings as consistent with PRI funds' greenwashing. We note, however, that what we uncover is based only on outcome-based measures and may miss some actual efforts of signatories.
KW - asset manager
KW - ESG
KW - greenwashing
KW - mutual funds
KW - SRI
KW - UN PRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149103709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149103709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4394
DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4394
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149103709
SN - 0025-1909
VL - 69
SP - 741
EP - 758
JO - Management Science
JF - Management Science
IS - 2
ER -