Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion

The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis

Harry T. Mai, Andrew D. Schneider*, Andrew P. Alvarez, Sohaib Z. Hashmi, Justin T. Smith, Ryan D. Freshman, Sean M. Mitchell, Charles D. Qin, Wellington K Hsu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This is a retrospective case series.Objective:Define the anatomic variations and the risk factors for such within the operative corridor of the transpsoas lateral interbody fusion.Summary of Background Data:The lateral interbody fusion approach has recently been associated with devastating complications such as injury to the lumbosacral plexus, surrounding vasculature, and bowel. A more comprehensive understanding of anatomic structures in relation to this approach using preoperative imaging would help surgeons identify high-risk patients potentially minimizing these complications.Materials and Methods:Age-sex distributed, naive lumbar spine magnetic resonance imagings (n=180) were used to identify the corridor for the lateral lumbar interbody approach using axial images. Bilateral measurements were taken from L1-S1 to determine the locations of critical vascular, intraperitoneal, and muscular structures. In addition, a subcohort of scoliosis patients (n=39) with a Cobb angle >10 degrees were identified and compared.Results:Right-sided vascular anatomy was significantly more variant than left (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P=0.001). There were 9 instances of "at-risk" vasculature on the right side compared with 0 on the left (P=0.004). Age increased vascular anatomy variance bilaterally, particularly in the more caudal levels (P≤0.001). A "rising-psoas sign" was observed in 26.1% of patients. Bowel was identified within the corridor in 30.5% of patients and correlated positively with body mass index (P<0.001). Scoliosis increased variant anatomy of left-sided vasculature at L2-3/L3-4. Nearly all variant anatomy in this group was found on the convex side of the curvature (94.2%).Conclusions:Given the risks and complications associated with this approach, careful planning must be taken with an understanding of vulnerable anatomic structures. Our analysis suggests that approaching the intervertebral space from the patient's left may reduce the risk of encountering critical vascular structures. Similarly, in the setting of scoliosis, an approach toward the concave side may have a more predictable course for surrounding anatomy.Level of Evidence:Level 3 - study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-221
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Spine Surgery
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Anatomy
Blood Vessels
Lumbosacral Plexus
Anatomic Variation
Spine
Body Mass Index
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • degenerative scoliosis
  • lateral transpsoas interbody fusion
  • lumbar spine surgery
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • spine surgery
  • spine surgery complications
  • surgical anatomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Mai, Harry T. ; Schneider, Andrew D. ; Alvarez, Andrew P. ; Hashmi, Sohaib Z. ; Smith, Justin T. ; Freshman, Ryan D. ; Mitchell, Sean M. ; Qin, Charles D. ; Hsu, Wellington K. / Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion : The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis. In: Clinical Spine Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 215-221.
@article{c9e60c1fa031498792767d52f62e2ce0,
title = "Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion: The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis",
abstract = "This is a retrospective case series.Objective:Define the anatomic variations and the risk factors for such within the operative corridor of the transpsoas lateral interbody fusion.Summary of Background Data:The lateral interbody fusion approach has recently been associated with devastating complications such as injury to the lumbosacral plexus, surrounding vasculature, and bowel. A more comprehensive understanding of anatomic structures in relation to this approach using preoperative imaging would help surgeons identify high-risk patients potentially minimizing these complications.Materials and Methods:Age-sex distributed, naive lumbar spine magnetic resonance imagings (n=180) were used to identify the corridor for the lateral lumbar interbody approach using axial images. Bilateral measurements were taken from L1-S1 to determine the locations of critical vascular, intraperitoneal, and muscular structures. In addition, a subcohort of scoliosis patients (n=39) with a Cobb angle >10 degrees were identified and compared.Results:Right-sided vascular anatomy was significantly more variant than left (9.9{\%} vs. 5.7{\%}; P=0.001). There were 9 instances of {"}at-risk{"} vasculature on the right side compared with 0 on the left (P=0.004). Age increased vascular anatomy variance bilaterally, particularly in the more caudal levels (P≤0.001). A {"}rising-psoas sign{"} was observed in 26.1{\%} of patients. Bowel was identified within the corridor in 30.5{\%} of patients and correlated positively with body mass index (P<0.001). Scoliosis increased variant anatomy of left-sided vasculature at L2-3/L3-4. Nearly all variant anatomy in this group was found on the convex side of the curvature (94.2{\%}).Conclusions:Given the risks and complications associated with this approach, careful planning must be taken with an understanding of vulnerable anatomic structures. Our analysis suggests that approaching the intervertebral space from the patient's left may reduce the risk of encountering critical vascular structures. Similarly, in the setting of scoliosis, an approach toward the concave side may have a more predictable course for surrounding anatomy.Level of Evidence:Level 3 - study.",
keywords = "degenerative scoliosis, lateral transpsoas interbody fusion, lumbar spine surgery, minimally invasive surgery, spine surgery, spine surgery complications, surgical anatomy",
author = "Mai, {Harry T.} and Schneider, {Andrew D.} and Alvarez, {Andrew P.} and Hashmi, {Sohaib Z.} and Smith, {Justin T.} and Freshman, {Ryan D.} and Mitchell, {Sean M.} and Qin, {Charles D.} and Hsu, {Wellington K}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0000000000000760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "215--221",
journal = "Clinical Spine Surgery",
issn = "2380-0186",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

Mai, HT, Schneider, AD, Alvarez, AP, Hashmi, SZ, Smith, JT, Freshman, RD, Mitchell, SM, Qin, CD & Hsu, WK 2019, 'Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion: The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis', Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000760

Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion : The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis. / Mai, Harry T.; Schneider, Andrew D.; Alvarez, Andrew P.; Hashmi, Sohaib Z.; Smith, Justin T.; Freshman, Ryan D.; Mitchell, Sean M.; Qin, Charles D.; Hsu, Wellington K.

In: Clinical Spine Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 5, 01.06.2019, p. 215-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion

T2 - The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis

AU - Mai, Harry T.

AU - Schneider, Andrew D.

AU - Alvarez, Andrew P.

AU - Hashmi, Sohaib Z.

AU - Smith, Justin T.

AU - Freshman, Ryan D.

AU - Mitchell, Sean M.

AU - Qin, Charles D.

AU - Hsu, Wellington K

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - This is a retrospective case series.Objective:Define the anatomic variations and the risk factors for such within the operative corridor of the transpsoas lateral interbody fusion.Summary of Background Data:The lateral interbody fusion approach has recently been associated with devastating complications such as injury to the lumbosacral plexus, surrounding vasculature, and bowel. A more comprehensive understanding of anatomic structures in relation to this approach using preoperative imaging would help surgeons identify high-risk patients potentially minimizing these complications.Materials and Methods:Age-sex distributed, naive lumbar spine magnetic resonance imagings (n=180) were used to identify the corridor for the lateral lumbar interbody approach using axial images. Bilateral measurements were taken from L1-S1 to determine the locations of critical vascular, intraperitoneal, and muscular structures. In addition, a subcohort of scoliosis patients (n=39) with a Cobb angle >10 degrees were identified and compared.Results:Right-sided vascular anatomy was significantly more variant than left (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P=0.001). There were 9 instances of "at-risk" vasculature on the right side compared with 0 on the left (P=0.004). Age increased vascular anatomy variance bilaterally, particularly in the more caudal levels (P≤0.001). A "rising-psoas sign" was observed in 26.1% of patients. Bowel was identified within the corridor in 30.5% of patients and correlated positively with body mass index (P<0.001). Scoliosis increased variant anatomy of left-sided vasculature at L2-3/L3-4. Nearly all variant anatomy in this group was found on the convex side of the curvature (94.2%).Conclusions:Given the risks and complications associated with this approach, careful planning must be taken with an understanding of vulnerable anatomic structures. Our analysis suggests that approaching the intervertebral space from the patient's left may reduce the risk of encountering critical vascular structures. Similarly, in the setting of scoliosis, an approach toward the concave side may have a more predictable course for surrounding anatomy.Level of Evidence:Level 3 - study.

AB - This is a retrospective case series.Objective:Define the anatomic variations and the risk factors for such within the operative corridor of the transpsoas lateral interbody fusion.Summary of Background Data:The lateral interbody fusion approach has recently been associated with devastating complications such as injury to the lumbosacral plexus, surrounding vasculature, and bowel. A more comprehensive understanding of anatomic structures in relation to this approach using preoperative imaging would help surgeons identify high-risk patients potentially minimizing these complications.Materials and Methods:Age-sex distributed, naive lumbar spine magnetic resonance imagings (n=180) were used to identify the corridor for the lateral lumbar interbody approach using axial images. Bilateral measurements were taken from L1-S1 to determine the locations of critical vascular, intraperitoneal, and muscular structures. In addition, a subcohort of scoliosis patients (n=39) with a Cobb angle >10 degrees were identified and compared.Results:Right-sided vascular anatomy was significantly more variant than left (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P=0.001). There were 9 instances of "at-risk" vasculature on the right side compared with 0 on the left (P=0.004). Age increased vascular anatomy variance bilaterally, particularly in the more caudal levels (P≤0.001). A "rising-psoas sign" was observed in 26.1% of patients. Bowel was identified within the corridor in 30.5% of patients and correlated positively with body mass index (P<0.001). Scoliosis increased variant anatomy of left-sided vasculature at L2-3/L3-4. Nearly all variant anatomy in this group was found on the convex side of the curvature (94.2%).Conclusions:Given the risks and complications associated with this approach, careful planning must be taken with an understanding of vulnerable anatomic structures. Our analysis suggests that approaching the intervertebral space from the patient's left may reduce the risk of encountering critical vascular structures. Similarly, in the setting of scoliosis, an approach toward the concave side may have a more predictable course for surrounding anatomy.Level of Evidence:Level 3 - study.

KW - degenerative scoliosis

KW - lateral transpsoas interbody fusion

KW - lumbar spine surgery

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - spine surgery

KW - spine surgery complications

KW - surgical anatomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066976685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066976685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000760

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000760

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 215

EP - 221

JO - Clinical Spine Surgery

JF - Clinical Spine Surgery

SN - 2380-0186

IS - 5

ER -