Anonymous assertions

Martijn Blaauw, Sanford C. Goldberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper addresses how the anonymity of an assertion affects the epistemological dimension of its production by speakers, and its reception by hearers. After arguing that anonymity does have implications in both respects, I go on to argue that at least some of these implications derive from a warranted diminishment in speakers' and hearers' expectations of one another when there are few mechanisms for enforcing the responsibilities attendant to speech. As a result, I argue, anonymous assertions do not carry the same ‘promise’ of the speaker's relevant epistemic authoritativeness that ordinary assertions do. If this is correct, the phenomenon of anonymity provides us with a lesson regarding ordinary assertions: their aptness for engendering belief in others, and so for communicating knowledge, depends in general on the very publicness of the act of assertion itself.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-151
Number of pages17
JournalEpisteme
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Anonymous assertions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this