TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptions prior to dental visits in the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA), 2015-2019
AU - Suda, Katie J.
AU - Fitzpatrick, Margaret A.
AU - Gibson, Gretchen
AU - Jurasic, M. Marianne
AU - Poggensee, Linda
AU - Echevarria, Kelly
AU - Hubbard, Colin C.
AU - McGregor, Jessina C.
AU - Evans, Charlesnika T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, Veterans’ Health Administration, Office of Research and Development (grant no. HSR&D IIR HX002452 to K.J.S), by an HSR&D Research Career Scientist Award (grant no. RCS 20-192 to C.T.E), and by a Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award (grant no. B2826-W to M.A.F.).
Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Department of Veterans' Affairs, Veterans' Health Administration, Office of Research and Development (grant no. HSR&D IIR HX002452 to K.J.S), by an HSR&D Research Career Scientist Award (grant no. RCS 20-192 to C.T.E), and by a Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award (grant no. B2826-W to M.A.F.).
Publisher Copyright:
© VHA, 2022.
PY - 2022/11/22
Y1 - 2022/11/22
N2 - Objective: To determine prophylaxis appropriateness by Veterans' Affairs (VA) dentists. Design: A cross-sectional study of dental visits, 2015-2019. Methods: Antibiotics within 7 days before a visit in the absence of an oral infection were included. Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as visits with gingival manipulation and further delineated into narrow and broad definitions based on comorbidities. The primary analysis applied a narrow definition of appropriate prophylaxis: cardiac conditions at the highest risk of an adverse outcome from endocarditis. The secondary analysis included a broader definition: cardiac or immunocompromising condition or tooth extractions and/or implants. Multivariable log-linear Poisson generalized estimating equation regression was used to assess the association between covariates and unnecessary prophylaxis prescriptions. Results: In total, 358,078 visits were associated with 369,102 antibiotics. The median prescription duration was 7 days (IQR, 7-10); only 6.5% were prescribed for 1 day. With the narrow definition, 15% of prophylaxis prescriptions were appropriate, which increased to 72% with the broader definition. Prophylaxis inconsistent with guidelines increased over time. For the narrow definition, Black (vs White) race, Latine (vs non-Latine) ethnicity, and visits located in the West census region were associated with unnecessary prophylaxis. Variables associated with a lower risk were older age, prosthetic joints, immunocompromising condition, and rural location. Conclusions: Of every 6 antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptions, 5 were inconsistent with guidelines. Improving prophylaxis appropriateness and shortening duration may have substantial implications for stewardship. Guidelines should state whether antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for extractions, implants, and immunocompromised patients.
AB - Objective: To determine prophylaxis appropriateness by Veterans' Affairs (VA) dentists. Design: A cross-sectional study of dental visits, 2015-2019. Methods: Antibiotics within 7 days before a visit in the absence of an oral infection were included. Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as visits with gingival manipulation and further delineated into narrow and broad definitions based on comorbidities. The primary analysis applied a narrow definition of appropriate prophylaxis: cardiac conditions at the highest risk of an adverse outcome from endocarditis. The secondary analysis included a broader definition: cardiac or immunocompromising condition or tooth extractions and/or implants. Multivariable log-linear Poisson generalized estimating equation regression was used to assess the association between covariates and unnecessary prophylaxis prescriptions. Results: In total, 358,078 visits were associated with 369,102 antibiotics. The median prescription duration was 7 days (IQR, 7-10); only 6.5% were prescribed for 1 day. With the narrow definition, 15% of prophylaxis prescriptions were appropriate, which increased to 72% with the broader definition. Prophylaxis inconsistent with guidelines increased over time. For the narrow definition, Black (vs White) race, Latine (vs non-Latine) ethnicity, and visits located in the West census region were associated with unnecessary prophylaxis. Variables associated with a lower risk were older age, prosthetic joints, immunocompromising condition, and rural location. Conclusions: Of every 6 antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptions, 5 were inconsistent with guidelines. Improving prophylaxis appropriateness and shortening duration may have substantial implications for stewardship. Guidelines should state whether antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for extractions, implants, and immunocompromised patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126061402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126061402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/ice.2021.521
DO - 10.1017/ice.2021.521
M3 - Article
C2 - 35189986
AN - SCOPUS:85126061402
SN - 0899-823X
VL - 43
SP - 1565
EP - 1574
JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
IS - 11
ER -