Anticipating the monsoon: The necessity and impossibility of the seasonal weather forecast for South Asia, 1886-1953

Sarah Carson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the most controversial of the activities of the India Meteorological Department (IMD): long-term seasonal forecasting for the South Asian subcontinent. Under the pressure of recurrent famines, in 1886 the imperial IMD commenced annual issue of monsoon predictions several months in advance, focused on one variable: rainfall. This state service was new to global late nineteenth-century meteorology, attempted first and most rigorously in India. Successive IMD leaders adapted the forecast in light of scientific and infrastructural developments, continuously revising the underlying methods of its production. All methods failed to achieve accurate prevision. Nevertheless, the imperatives of economic administration, empire and public demand compelled IMD scientists to continue annual publication of this unreliable product. This article contends that the seasonal forecast is best understood as an enduring ritual of good governance in a monsoonal environment. Through analysis of newspaper controversies, it suggests that although the seasonal forecast was the most compelling justification for the IMD's imperial and global importance, its limitations undercut popular trust in modern meteorology. Finally, this case illustrates the centrality of 'tropical meteorology' to the historical development of modern atmospheric science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-325
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Science
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anticipating the monsoon: The necessity and impossibility of the seasonal weather forecast for South Asia, 1886-1953'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this