TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of mathematical modelling to inform national malaria intervention planning in Nigeria
AU - Ozodiegwu, Ifeoma D.
AU - Ambrose, Monique
AU - Galatas, Beatriz
AU - Runge, Manuela
AU - Nandi, Aadrita
AU - Okuneye, Kamaldeen
AU - Dhanoa, Neena Parveen
AU - Maikore, Ibrahim
AU - Uhomoibhi, Perpetua
AU - Bever, Caitlin
AU - Noor, Abdisalan
AU - Gerardin, Jaline
N1 - Funding Information:
IDO, MR, AN, KO, NPD, and JG were supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-002092). MA and CB were supported by Bill and Melinda Gates through the Global Good Fund. The funders had no role in the design or analysis of this study.
Funding Information:
We thank the Nigeria NMEP and the WHO for the opportunity to support the subnational tailoring of interventions, for helpful discussions, and for collection, management, cleaning, preparation, sharing, and interpretation of data including routine surveillance, intervention deployment, and SMC coverage data used to parameterize and calibrate the model. We also acknowledge Mateusz Plucinski for providing longitudinal data on HRP2 concentrations and Tamara Ehler for helping to assemble the country intervention timeline. Beatriz Galatas, Ibrahim Maikore, and Abdisalan Noor are staff members of the World Health Organization. These authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the World Health Organization.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: For their 2021–2025 National Malaria Strategic Plan (NMSP), Nigeria’s National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), in partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO), developed a targeted approach to intervention deployment at the local government area (LGA) level as part of the High Burden to High Impact response. Mathematical models of malaria transmission were used to predict the impact of proposed intervention strategies on malaria burden. Methods: An agent-based model of Plasmodium falciparum transmission was used to simulate malaria morbidity and mortality in Nigeria’s 774 LGAs under four possible intervention strategies from 2020 to 2030. The scenarios represented the previously implemented plan (business-as-usual), the NMSP at an 80% or higher coverage level and two prioritized plans according to the resources available to Nigeria. LGAs were clustered into 22 epidemiological archetypes using monthly rainfall, temperature suitability index, vector abundance, pre-2010 parasite prevalence, and pre-2010 vector control coverage. Routine incidence data were used to parameterize seasonality in each archetype. Each LGA’s baseline malaria transmission intensity was calibrated to parasite prevalence in children under the age of five years measured in the 2010 Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS). Intervention coverage in the 2010–2019 period was obtained from the Demographic and Health Survey, MIS, the NMEP, and post-campaign surveys. Results: Pursuing a business-as-usual strategy was projected to result in a 5% and 9% increase in malaria incidence in 2025 and 2030 compared with 2020, while deaths were projected to remain unchanged by 2030. The greatest intervention impact was associated with the NMSP scenario with 80% or greater coverage of standard interventions coupled with intermittent preventive treatment in infants and extension of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) to 404 LGAs, compared to 80 LGAs in 2019. The budget-prioritized scenario with SMC expansion to 310 LGAs, high bed net coverage with new formulations, and increase in effective case management rate at the same pace as historical levels was adopted as an adequate alternative for the resources available. Conclusions: Dynamical models can be applied for relative assessment of the impact of intervention scenarios but improved subnational data collection systems are required to allow increased confidence in predictions at sub-national level.
AB - Background: For their 2021–2025 National Malaria Strategic Plan (NMSP), Nigeria’s National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), in partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO), developed a targeted approach to intervention deployment at the local government area (LGA) level as part of the High Burden to High Impact response. Mathematical models of malaria transmission were used to predict the impact of proposed intervention strategies on malaria burden. Methods: An agent-based model of Plasmodium falciparum transmission was used to simulate malaria morbidity and mortality in Nigeria’s 774 LGAs under four possible intervention strategies from 2020 to 2030. The scenarios represented the previously implemented plan (business-as-usual), the NMSP at an 80% or higher coverage level and two prioritized plans according to the resources available to Nigeria. LGAs were clustered into 22 epidemiological archetypes using monthly rainfall, temperature suitability index, vector abundance, pre-2010 parasite prevalence, and pre-2010 vector control coverage. Routine incidence data were used to parameterize seasonality in each archetype. Each LGA’s baseline malaria transmission intensity was calibrated to parasite prevalence in children under the age of five years measured in the 2010 Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS). Intervention coverage in the 2010–2019 period was obtained from the Demographic and Health Survey, MIS, the NMEP, and post-campaign surveys. Results: Pursuing a business-as-usual strategy was projected to result in a 5% and 9% increase in malaria incidence in 2025 and 2030 compared with 2020, while deaths were projected to remain unchanged by 2030. The greatest intervention impact was associated with the NMSP scenario with 80% or greater coverage of standard interventions coupled with intermittent preventive treatment in infants and extension of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) to 404 LGAs, compared to 80 LGAs in 2019. The budget-prioritized scenario with SMC expansion to 310 LGAs, high bed net coverage with new formulations, and increase in effective case management rate at the same pace as historical levels was adopted as an adequate alternative for the resources available. Conclusions: Dynamical models can be applied for relative assessment of the impact of intervention scenarios but improved subnational data collection systems are required to allow increased confidence in predictions at sub-national level.
KW - Impact predictions
KW - Intervention targeting
KW - Malaria
KW - Mathematical modeling
KW - National strategic planning
KW - Stratification
KW - Subnational tailoring of interventions
KW - Transmission models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154603616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85154603616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12936-023-04563-w
DO - 10.1186/s12936-023-04563-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 37101146
AN - SCOPUS:85154603616
SN - 1475-2875
VL - 22
JO - Malaria Journal
JF - Malaria Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 137
ER -