Applying systematic bibliometric methods to track a journal’s impact and review its knowledge contribution

Amitabh Anand*, Ritu Tripathi, Anjana Karumathil, Tanvika Kalra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Advanced bibliometric methods have emerged as key tools in mapping the history and trends of a discipline. This paper aims to demonstrate on applying various bibliometric methods to track a journal’s impact and review its knowledge contribution. In doing so, the authors take the case of IIMB Management Review (IMR) journal focused on management discipline, in consideration of its 10 years of publication presence. Design/methodology/approach: Using bibliometric and Scopus metric methods, the authors map and analyze the productivity of IMR Journal and map its knowledge contributions. Findings: The authors identify the IMR journal’s impact, its growth, the most prolific authors/affiliations, key research hotspots, cross-country collaboration and emerging trends over the past decade. Originality/value: A 10-year longitudinal review helps the target group identify the main themes. It also provides key empirical insights to the journal editorial board and library managers for future planning and growth of the journal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)928-946
Number of pages19
JournalGlobal Knowledge, Memory and Communication
Volume71
Issue number8-9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 5 2022

Funding

The authors are grateful to the editor in chief and the two anonymous reviewers for their guidance and constructive comments. Author Anjana Karumathil from IIMB is supported by a fellowship from the Mirae Asset Foundation.

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • India
  • Information management
  • Journal impact
  • Library management
  • Literature review
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying systematic bibliometric methods to track a journal’s impact and review its knowledge contribution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this