Appointing extremists

Michael A. Bailey*, Matthew Laurence Spitzer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Given their long tenure and broad powers, Supreme Court justices are among the most powerful actors in American politics. In this paper, we present a model of the nomination process that highlights the how uncertainty about a potential justice's preferences can lead a president to prefer a nominee with extreme preferences. In certain cases, Senators may also prefer extreme nominees, leading to the nomination and confirmation of justices whose preferences seem to diverge from those of elected officials. While our focus in this paper is on the Supreme Court, the analysis extends in many ways to other multimember appointed bodies as well.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)105-137
    Number of pages33
    JournalAmerican Law and Economics Review
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Finance
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Appointing extremists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this