Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students

Results of a National Survey

Toshiko Uchida*, Yoon Soo Park, Robin K. Ovitsh, Joanne Hojsak, Deepthiman Gowda, Jeanne M. Farnan, Mary Boyle, Angela D. Blood, Francis I. Achike, Ronald C. Silvestri

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To assess current approaches to teaching the physical exam to preclerkship students at U.S. medical schools. Method The Directors of Clinical Skills Courses developed a 49-question survey addressing the approach, pedagogical methods, and assessment methods of preclerkship physical exam curricula. The survey was administered to all 141 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S. medical schools in October 2015. Results were aggregated across schools, and survey weights were used to adjust for response rate and school size. Results One hundred six medical schools (75%) responded. Seventy-nine percent of schools (84) began teaching the physical exam within the first two months of medical school. Fifty-six percent of schools (59) employed both a "head-to-toe" comprehensive approach and a clinical reasoning approach. Twenty-three percent (24) taught a portion of the physical exam interprofessionally. Videos, online modules, and simulators were used widely, and 39% of schools (41) used bedside ultrasonography. Schools reported a median of 4 formative assessments and 3 summative assessments, with 16% of schools (17) using criterion-based standard-setting methods for physical exam assessments. Results did not vary significantly by school size. Conclusions There was wide variation in how medical schools taught the physical exam to preclerkship students. Common pedagogical approaches included early initiation of physical exam instruction, use of technology, and methods that support clinical reasoning and competency-based medical education. Approaches used by a minority of schools included interprofessional education, ultrasound, and criterion-based standard-setting methods for assessments. Opportunities abound for research into the optimal methods for teaching the physical exam.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-134
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

medical student
Teaching
school
education
director
video
student
minority
instruction
curriculum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Uchida, T., Park, Y. S., Ovitsh, R. K., Hojsak, J., Gowda, D., Farnan, J. M., ... Silvestri, R. C. (2019). Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students: Results of a National Survey. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002433
Uchida, Toshiko ; Park, Yoon Soo ; Ovitsh, Robin K. ; Hojsak, Joanne ; Gowda, Deepthiman ; Farnan, Jeanne M. ; Boyle, Mary ; Blood, Angela D. ; Achike, Francis I. ; Silvestri, Ronald C. / Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students : Results of a National Survey. In: Academic Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 94, No. 1. pp. 129-134.
@article{c61c46968fa04bc4b49ebc4e076aec34,
title = "Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students: Results of a National Survey",
abstract = "Purpose To assess current approaches to teaching the physical exam to preclerkship students at U.S. medical schools. Method The Directors of Clinical Skills Courses developed a 49-question survey addressing the approach, pedagogical methods, and assessment methods of preclerkship physical exam curricula. The survey was administered to all 141 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S. medical schools in October 2015. Results were aggregated across schools, and survey weights were used to adjust for response rate and school size. Results One hundred six medical schools (75{\%}) responded. Seventy-nine percent of schools (84) began teaching the physical exam within the first two months of medical school. Fifty-six percent of schools (59) employed both a {"}head-to-toe{"} comprehensive approach and a clinical reasoning approach. Twenty-three percent (24) taught a portion of the physical exam interprofessionally. Videos, online modules, and simulators were used widely, and 39{\%} of schools (41) used bedside ultrasonography. Schools reported a median of 4 formative assessments and 3 summative assessments, with 16{\%} of schools (17) using criterion-based standard-setting methods for physical exam assessments. Results did not vary significantly by school size. Conclusions There was wide variation in how medical schools taught the physical exam to preclerkship students. Common pedagogical approaches included early initiation of physical exam instruction, use of technology, and methods that support clinical reasoning and competency-based medical education. Approaches used by a minority of schools included interprofessional education, ultrasound, and criterion-based standard-setting methods for assessments. Opportunities abound for research into the optimal methods for teaching the physical exam.",
author = "Toshiko Uchida and Park, {Yoon Soo} and Ovitsh, {Robin K.} and Joanne Hojsak and Deepthiman Gowda and Farnan, {Jeanne M.} and Mary Boyle and Blood, {Angela D.} and Achike, {Francis I.} and Silvestri, {Ronald C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002433",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "129--134",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Uchida, T, Park, YS, Ovitsh, RK, Hojsak, J, Gowda, D, Farnan, JM, Boyle, M, Blood, AD, Achike, FI & Silvestri, RC 2019, 'Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students: Results of a National Survey', Academic Medicine, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002433

Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students : Results of a National Survey. / Uchida, Toshiko; Park, Yoon Soo; Ovitsh, Robin K.; Hojsak, Joanne; Gowda, Deepthiman; Farnan, Jeanne M.; Boyle, Mary; Blood, Angela D.; Achike, Francis I.; Silvestri, Ronald C.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 94, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 129-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to Teaching the Physical Exam to Preclerkship Medical Students

T2 - Results of a National Survey

AU - Uchida, Toshiko

AU - Park, Yoon Soo

AU - Ovitsh, Robin K.

AU - Hojsak, Joanne

AU - Gowda, Deepthiman

AU - Farnan, Jeanne M.

AU - Boyle, Mary

AU - Blood, Angela D.

AU - Achike, Francis I.

AU - Silvestri, Ronald C.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose To assess current approaches to teaching the physical exam to preclerkship students at U.S. medical schools. Method The Directors of Clinical Skills Courses developed a 49-question survey addressing the approach, pedagogical methods, and assessment methods of preclerkship physical exam curricula. The survey was administered to all 141 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S. medical schools in October 2015. Results were aggregated across schools, and survey weights were used to adjust for response rate and school size. Results One hundred six medical schools (75%) responded. Seventy-nine percent of schools (84) began teaching the physical exam within the first two months of medical school. Fifty-six percent of schools (59) employed both a "head-to-toe" comprehensive approach and a clinical reasoning approach. Twenty-three percent (24) taught a portion of the physical exam interprofessionally. Videos, online modules, and simulators were used widely, and 39% of schools (41) used bedside ultrasonography. Schools reported a median of 4 formative assessments and 3 summative assessments, with 16% of schools (17) using criterion-based standard-setting methods for physical exam assessments. Results did not vary significantly by school size. Conclusions There was wide variation in how medical schools taught the physical exam to preclerkship students. Common pedagogical approaches included early initiation of physical exam instruction, use of technology, and methods that support clinical reasoning and competency-based medical education. Approaches used by a minority of schools included interprofessional education, ultrasound, and criterion-based standard-setting methods for assessments. Opportunities abound for research into the optimal methods for teaching the physical exam.

AB - Purpose To assess current approaches to teaching the physical exam to preclerkship students at U.S. medical schools. Method The Directors of Clinical Skills Courses developed a 49-question survey addressing the approach, pedagogical methods, and assessment methods of preclerkship physical exam curricula. The survey was administered to all 141 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S. medical schools in October 2015. Results were aggregated across schools, and survey weights were used to adjust for response rate and school size. Results One hundred six medical schools (75%) responded. Seventy-nine percent of schools (84) began teaching the physical exam within the first two months of medical school. Fifty-six percent of schools (59) employed both a "head-to-toe" comprehensive approach and a clinical reasoning approach. Twenty-three percent (24) taught a portion of the physical exam interprofessionally. Videos, online modules, and simulators were used widely, and 39% of schools (41) used bedside ultrasonography. Schools reported a median of 4 formative assessments and 3 summative assessments, with 16% of schools (17) using criterion-based standard-setting methods for physical exam assessments. Results did not vary significantly by school size. Conclusions There was wide variation in how medical schools taught the physical exam to preclerkship students. Common pedagogical approaches included early initiation of physical exam instruction, use of technology, and methods that support clinical reasoning and competency-based medical education. Approaches used by a minority of schools included interprofessional education, ultrasound, and criterion-based standard-setting methods for assessments. Opportunities abound for research into the optimal methods for teaching the physical exam.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059130918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059130918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002433

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002433

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 129

EP - 134

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 1

ER -