Abstract
First, a qualifier: the 'response-to-the-response' section of Archaeological dialogues is often the most entertaining part of the issue, but frequently the least intellectually rewarding. One feels Schadenfreude, partisan cheering and jeering, and bafflement in equal measure as contributors lock horns over this or that finer point of who has misrepresented whom. I am anxious to avoid readers reacting to what follows in such a manner, and so will concentrate on a very selective range of raised points that, to put it crudely, got me thinking.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 167-182 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Archaeological Dialogues |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2006 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Archaeology