Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? An analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database

Santhanam Suresh, Justin Bradley Long, Patrick K Birmingham, Gildasio S De Oliveira Jr*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The caudal block is the most commonly performed regional anesthesia technique in pediatric patients undergoing surgical procedures, but safety concerns raised by previous reports remain to be addressed. Our main objective in current investigation was to estimate the overall and specific incidence of complications associated with the performance of caudal block in children. METHODS: This was an observational study using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database. A complication after a caudal block was defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following: block failure, vascular puncture, intravascular test dose, dural puncture, seizure, cardiac arrest, sacral pain, or neurologic symptoms. In addition, if a complication was also coded, the presence of temporary or permanent sequelae was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to identify patterns of local anesthetic dosage. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand six hundred-fifty children who received a caudal block were included in the study. The overall estimated incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of complications after caudal blocks was 1.9% (1.7%-2.1%). Patients who developed complications were younger, median (interquartile range) of 11 (5-24) months, compared to those who did not develop any complications, 14 (7-29) months, P = 0.001. The most common complications were block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection. No cases of temporary or permanent sequelae were identified leading to an estimated incidence (95% CI) of 0.005% (- % to 0.03%). Four thousand four hundred-six of 17,867 (24.6%; 95% CI, 24%-25.2%) subjects received doses (>2 mg of bupivacaine equivalents/kg) that could be potentially unsafe. CONCLUSIONS: Safety concerns should not be a barrier to the use of caudal blocks in children assuming an appropriate selection of local anesthetic dosage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-156
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Conduction Anesthesia
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Pediatrics
Local Anesthetics
Punctures
Pain
Incidence
Safety
Bupivacaine
Neurologic Manifestations
Heart Arrest
Observational Studies
Blood Vessels
Seizures
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{a5d67ee0e04a413fa98d581e086bc4d2,
title = "Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? An analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The caudal block is the most commonly performed regional anesthesia technique in pediatric patients undergoing surgical procedures, but safety concerns raised by previous reports remain to be addressed. Our main objective in current investigation was to estimate the overall and specific incidence of complications associated with the performance of caudal block in children. METHODS: This was an observational study using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database. A complication after a caudal block was defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following: block failure, vascular puncture, intravascular test dose, dural puncture, seizure, cardiac arrest, sacral pain, or neurologic symptoms. In addition, if a complication was also coded, the presence of temporary or permanent sequelae was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to identify patterns of local anesthetic dosage. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand six hundred-fifty children who received a caudal block were included in the study. The overall estimated incidence (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]) of complications after caudal blocks was 1.9{\%} (1.7{\%}-2.1{\%}). Patients who developed complications were younger, median (interquartile range) of 11 (5-24) months, compared to those who did not develop any complications, 14 (7-29) months, P = 0.001. The most common complications were block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection. No cases of temporary or permanent sequelae were identified leading to an estimated incidence (95{\%} CI) of 0.005{\%} (- {\%} to 0.03{\%}). Four thousand four hundred-six of 17,867 (24.6{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 24{\%}-25.2{\%}) subjects received doses (>2 mg of bupivacaine equivalents/kg) that could be potentially unsafe. CONCLUSIONS: Safety concerns should not be a barrier to the use of caudal blocks in children assuming an appropriate selection of local anesthetic dosage.",
author = "Santhanam Suresh and Long, {Justin Bradley} and Birmingham, {Patrick K} and {De Oliveira Jr}, {Gildasio S}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0000000000000446",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "151--156",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? An analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database. / Suresh, Santhanam; Long, Justin Bradley; Birmingham, Patrick K; De Oliveira Jr, Gildasio S.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 120, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 151-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? An analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database

AU - Suresh, Santhanam

AU - Long, Justin Bradley

AU - Birmingham, Patrick K

AU - De Oliveira Jr, Gildasio S

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The caudal block is the most commonly performed regional anesthesia technique in pediatric patients undergoing surgical procedures, but safety concerns raised by previous reports remain to be addressed. Our main objective in current investigation was to estimate the overall and specific incidence of complications associated with the performance of caudal block in children. METHODS: This was an observational study using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database. A complication after a caudal block was defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following: block failure, vascular puncture, intravascular test dose, dural puncture, seizure, cardiac arrest, sacral pain, or neurologic symptoms. In addition, if a complication was also coded, the presence of temporary or permanent sequelae was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to identify patterns of local anesthetic dosage. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand six hundred-fifty children who received a caudal block were included in the study. The overall estimated incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of complications after caudal blocks was 1.9% (1.7%-2.1%). Patients who developed complications were younger, median (interquartile range) of 11 (5-24) months, compared to those who did not develop any complications, 14 (7-29) months, P = 0.001. The most common complications were block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection. No cases of temporary or permanent sequelae were identified leading to an estimated incidence (95% CI) of 0.005% (- % to 0.03%). Four thousand four hundred-six of 17,867 (24.6%; 95% CI, 24%-25.2%) subjects received doses (>2 mg of bupivacaine equivalents/kg) that could be potentially unsafe. CONCLUSIONS: Safety concerns should not be a barrier to the use of caudal blocks in children assuming an appropriate selection of local anesthetic dosage.

AB - BACKGROUND: The caudal block is the most commonly performed regional anesthesia technique in pediatric patients undergoing surgical procedures, but safety concerns raised by previous reports remain to be addressed. Our main objective in current investigation was to estimate the overall and specific incidence of complications associated with the performance of caudal block in children. METHODS: This was an observational study using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database. A complication after a caudal block was defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following: block failure, vascular puncture, intravascular test dose, dural puncture, seizure, cardiac arrest, sacral pain, or neurologic symptoms. In addition, if a complication was also coded, the presence of temporary or permanent sequelae was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to identify patterns of local anesthetic dosage. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand six hundred-fifty children who received a caudal block were included in the study. The overall estimated incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of complications after caudal blocks was 1.9% (1.7%-2.1%). Patients who developed complications were younger, median (interquartile range) of 11 (5-24) months, compared to those who did not develop any complications, 14 (7-29) months, P = 0.001. The most common complications were block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection. No cases of temporary or permanent sequelae were identified leading to an estimated incidence (95% CI) of 0.005% (- % to 0.03%). Four thousand four hundred-six of 17,867 (24.6%; 95% CI, 24%-25.2%) subjects received doses (>2 mg of bupivacaine equivalents/kg) that could be potentially unsafe. CONCLUSIONS: Safety concerns should not be a barrier to the use of caudal blocks in children assuming an appropriate selection of local anesthetic dosage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923923423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923923423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000446

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000446

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 151

EP - 156

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 1

ER -