Are self-deceivers enhancing positive affect or denying negative affect? Toward an understanding of implicit affective processes

Michael Robinson*, Sara Moeller, Paul Goetz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-deception is an important construct in social, personality, and clinical literatures. Although historical and clinical views of self-deception have regarded it as defensive in nature and operation, modern views of this individual difference variable instead highlight its apparent benefits to subjective mental health. The present four studies reinforce the latter view by showing that self-deception predicts positive priming effects, but not negative priming effects, in reaction time tasks sensitive to individual differences in affective priming. In all studies, individuals higher in self-deception displayed stronger positive priming effects, defined in terms of facilitation with two positive stimuli in a consecutive sequence, but self-deception did not predict negative priming effects in the same tasks. Importantly, these effects occurred both in tasks that called for the retrieval of self-knowledge (Study 1) and those that did not (Studies 2-4). This broad pattern supports substantive views of self-deception rather than views narrowly focused on self-presentation processes. Implications for understanding self-deception are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-180
Number of pages29
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 5 2009

Fingerprint

Deception
Individuality
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Affective
Positive Affect
Self-deception
Personality
Mental Health
Priming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{456bedec610e4c5b86b82be22a212752,
title = "Are self-deceivers enhancing positive affect or denying negative affect? Toward an understanding of implicit affective processes",
abstract = "Self-deception is an important construct in social, personality, and clinical literatures. Although historical and clinical views of self-deception have regarded it as defensive in nature and operation, modern views of this individual difference variable instead highlight its apparent benefits to subjective mental health. The present four studies reinforce the latter view by showing that self-deception predicts positive priming effects, but not negative priming effects, in reaction time tasks sensitive to individual differences in affective priming. In all studies, individuals higher in self-deception displayed stronger positive priming effects, defined in terms of facilitation with two positive stimuli in a consecutive sequence, but self-deception did not predict negative priming effects in the same tasks. Importantly, these effects occurred both in tasks that called for the retrieval of self-knowledge (Study 1) and those that did not (Studies 2-4). This broad pattern supports substantive views of self-deception rather than views narrowly focused on self-presentation processes. Implications for understanding self-deception are discussed.",
author = "Michael Robinson and Sara Moeller and Paul Goetz",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/02699930801961707",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "152--180",
journal = "Cognition and Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Are self-deceivers enhancing positive affect or denying negative affect? Toward an understanding of implicit affective processes. / Robinson, Michael; Moeller, Sara; Goetz, Paul.

In: Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 23, No. 1, 05.01.2009, p. 152-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are self-deceivers enhancing positive affect or denying negative affect? Toward an understanding of implicit affective processes

AU - Robinson, Michael

AU - Moeller, Sara

AU - Goetz, Paul

PY - 2009/1/5

Y1 - 2009/1/5

N2 - Self-deception is an important construct in social, personality, and clinical literatures. Although historical and clinical views of self-deception have regarded it as defensive in nature and operation, modern views of this individual difference variable instead highlight its apparent benefits to subjective mental health. The present four studies reinforce the latter view by showing that self-deception predicts positive priming effects, but not negative priming effects, in reaction time tasks sensitive to individual differences in affective priming. In all studies, individuals higher in self-deception displayed stronger positive priming effects, defined in terms of facilitation with two positive stimuli in a consecutive sequence, but self-deception did not predict negative priming effects in the same tasks. Importantly, these effects occurred both in tasks that called for the retrieval of self-knowledge (Study 1) and those that did not (Studies 2-4). This broad pattern supports substantive views of self-deception rather than views narrowly focused on self-presentation processes. Implications for understanding self-deception are discussed.

AB - Self-deception is an important construct in social, personality, and clinical literatures. Although historical and clinical views of self-deception have regarded it as defensive in nature and operation, modern views of this individual difference variable instead highlight its apparent benefits to subjective mental health. The present four studies reinforce the latter view by showing that self-deception predicts positive priming effects, but not negative priming effects, in reaction time tasks sensitive to individual differences in affective priming. In all studies, individuals higher in self-deception displayed stronger positive priming effects, defined in terms of facilitation with two positive stimuli in a consecutive sequence, but self-deception did not predict negative priming effects in the same tasks. Importantly, these effects occurred both in tasks that called for the retrieval of self-knowledge (Study 1) and those that did not (Studies 2-4). This broad pattern supports substantive views of self-deception rather than views narrowly focused on self-presentation processes. Implications for understanding self-deception are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58049209802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58049209802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699930801961707

DO - 10.1080/02699930801961707

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58049209802

VL - 23

SP - 152

EP - 180

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

IS - 1

ER -