Are we allowing impact factor to have too much impact: The need to reassess the process of academic advancement in pediatric cardiology?

Rohit S. Loomba, Robert H. Anderson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Impact factor has been used as a metric by which to gauge scientific journals for several years. A metric meant to describe the performance of a journal overall, impact factor has also become a metric used to gauge individual performance as well. This has held true in the field of pediatric cardiology where many divisions utilize impact factor of journals that an individual has published in to help determine the individual's academic achievement. This subsequently can impact the individual's promotion through the academic ranks. We review the purpose of impact factor, its strengths and weaknesses, discuss why impact factor is not a fair metric to apply to individuals, and offer alternative means by which to gauge individual performance for academic promotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-166
Number of pages4
JournalCongenital Heart Disease
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Keywords

  • academic promotion
  • H-index
  • I-10 index
  • impact factor
  • pediatric cardiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are we allowing impact factor to have too much impact: The need to reassess the process of academic advancement in pediatric cardiology?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this