TY - JOUR
T1 - Argument structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions
AU - den Ouden, Dirk Bart
AU - Fix, Steve
AU - Parrish, Todd B.
AU - Thompson, Cynthia K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by NIH grant R01-DC007213-01 to C.K. Thompson. The authors wish to thank Kyla Garibaldi, Ellyn Riley, Keli Rulf and Anthony Shook for their assistance with stimulus preparation and data collection.
PY - 2009/3
Y1 - 2009/3
N2 - Argument structure, as in the participant roles entailed within the lexical representation of verbs, affects verb processing. Recent neuroimaging studies show that when verbs are heard or read, the posterior temporoparietal region shows increased activation for verbs with greater versus lesser argument structure complexity, usually bilaterally. In addition, patients with agrammatic aphasia show verb production deficits, graded based on argument structure complexity. In the present study, we used fMRI to examine the neural correlates of verb production in overt action naming conditions. In addition, we tested the differential effects of naming when verbs were presented dynamically in video segments versus statically in line drawings. Results showed increased neuronal activity associated with production of transitive as compared to intransitive verbs not only in posterior regions, but also in left inferior frontal cortex. We also found significantly greater activation for transitive versus intransitive action naming for videos compared to pictures in the right inferior and superior parietal cortices, areas associated with object manipulation. These findings indicate that verbs with greater argument structure density engender graded activation of both anterior and posterior portions of the language network and support verb naming deficit patterns reported in lesion studies. In addition, the similar findings derived under video and static picture naming conditions provide validity for using videos in neuroimaging studies, which are more naturalistic and perhaps ecologically valid than using static pictures to investigate action naming.
AB - Argument structure, as in the participant roles entailed within the lexical representation of verbs, affects verb processing. Recent neuroimaging studies show that when verbs are heard or read, the posterior temporoparietal region shows increased activation for verbs with greater versus lesser argument structure complexity, usually bilaterally. In addition, patients with agrammatic aphasia show verb production deficits, graded based on argument structure complexity. In the present study, we used fMRI to examine the neural correlates of verb production in overt action naming conditions. In addition, we tested the differential effects of naming when verbs were presented dynamically in video segments versus statically in line drawings. Results showed increased neuronal activity associated with production of transitive as compared to intransitive verbs not only in posterior regions, but also in left inferior frontal cortex. We also found significantly greater activation for transitive versus intransitive action naming for videos compared to pictures in the right inferior and superior parietal cortices, areas associated with object manipulation. These findings indicate that verbs with greater argument structure density engender graded activation of both anterior and posterior portions of the language network and support verb naming deficit patterns reported in lesion studies. In addition, the similar findings derived under video and static picture naming conditions provide validity for using videos in neuroimaging studies, which are more naturalistic and perhaps ecologically valid than using static pictures to investigate action naming.
KW - Argument structure
KW - Naming
KW - Verbs
KW - Videos
KW - fMRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149345704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149345704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.10.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 20160850
AN - SCOPUS:58149345704
SN - 0911-6044
VL - 22
SP - 196
EP - 215
JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics
JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics
IS - 2
ER -