Artificial neural network-based model enhances risk stratification and reduces non-invasive cardiac stress imaging compared to Diamond–Forrester and Morise risk assessment models: A prospective study

Hussain A. Isma’eel*, George E. Sakr, Mustapha Serhan, Nader Lamaa, Ayman Hakim, Paul C. Cremer, Wael A. Jaber, Torkom Garabedian, Imad Elhajj, Antoine B. Abchee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) accounts for more than half of all cardiovascular events. Stress testing remains the cornerstone for non-invasive assessment of patients with possible or known CAD. Clinical utilization reviews show that most patients presenting for evaluation of stable CAD by stress testing are categorized as low risk prior to the test. Attempts to enhance risk stratification of individuals who are sent for stress testing seem to be more in need today. The present study compares artificial neural networks (ANN)-based prediction models to the other risk models being used in practice (the Diamond–Forrester and the Morise models). Methods: In our study, we prospectively recruited patients who were 19 years of age or older, and were being evaluated for coronary artery disease with imaging-based stress tests. For ANN, the network architecture employed a systematic method, where the number of neurons is changed incrementally, and bootstrapping was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the models. Results: We prospectively enrolled 486 patients. The mean age of patients undergoing stress test was 55.2 ± 11.2 years, 35% were women, and 12% had a positive stress test for ischemic heart disease. When compared to Diamond–Forrester and Morise risk models, the ANN model for predicting ischemia provided higher discriminatory power (DP)(1.61), had a negative predictive value of 98%, Sensitivity 91% [81%-97%], Specificity 65% [60%-79%], positive predictive value 26%, and a potential 59% reduction of non-invasive imaging. Conclusion: The ANN models improved risk stratification when compared to the other risk scores (Diamond–Forrester and Morise) with a 98% negative predictive value and a significant potential reduction in non-invasive imaging tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1601-1609
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Keywords

  • Artificial neural networks (ANN)
  • Diamond–Forrester score
  • Morise score
  • nuclear stress test
  • stress echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial neural network-based model enhances risk stratification and reduces non-invasive cardiac stress imaging compared to Diamond–Forrester and Morise risk assessment models: A prospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this