Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in the frog Xenopus laevis: Two AhR1 paralogs exhibit low affinity for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)

Jeremy Arlin Lavine, Ashley J. Rowatt, Tatyana Klimova, Aric J. Whitington, Emelyne Dengler, Catherine Beck, Wade H. Powell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a potent developmental toxicant in most vertebrates. However, frogs are relatively insensitive to TCDD toxicity, especially during early life stages. Toxicity of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons is mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and specific differences in properties of the AhR signaling pathway can underlie in TCDD toxicity in different species. This study investigated the role of AhR in frog TCDD insensitivity, using Xenopus laevis as a model system. X. laevis, a pseudotetraploid species, expresses two distinct AhR1 genes, AhR1α and AhR1β. Sharing 86% amino acid identity, these likely represent distinct genes, both orthologous to mammalian AhR and paralogous to the AhR2 gene(s) in most fish. Both AhR1α and AhR1β exhibit TCDD-dependent binding of cognate DNA sequences, but they bind TCDD with at least 20-fold lower affinity than the mouse AhRb-1 protein, and they are similarly less responsive in TCDD-induced reporter gene induction in conjunction with the mouse CYP1A1 promoter. Furthermore, CYP1A6 and CYP1A7 induction by TCDD in cultured X. laevis A6 cells appears much less responsive than CYP1A induction in cell lines derived from more sensitive animals. Taken together, these data suggest that low affinity binding by X. laevis AhRs plays an important mechanistic role in the insensitivity of frogs to TCDD. An understanding of these molecular mechanisms should aid amphibian ecotoxicology and refine the use of frog embryos as a model [e.g. in FETAX (Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay-Xenopus)] for determining developmental toxicity of samples containing dioxin-like compounds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-72
Number of pages13
JournalToxicological Sciences
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Funding

We thank Dr. Mark E. Hahn, Dr. Sibel Karchner, and Diana Franks (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) for their generous sharing of advice, assistance, and materials in development of ligand binding assays and luciferase reporter gene assays. Blythe H. Philips (Kenyon College) provided expert technical assistance and animal husbandry support. Dr. C. A. Bradfield (University of Wisconsin) generously provided pSPORTAhR and pSPOR-TARNT plasmids. We thank Dr. Christopher M. Gillen (Kenyon College) for his critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Kenyon College Summer Science Scholars Program, Kenyon College Faculty Development Funds, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R15 ES011130). Conflict of interest: none declared.

Keywords

  • Aryl hydrocarbon receptors
  • FETAX
  • TCDD
  • Xenopus laevis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in the frog Xenopus laevis: Two AhR1 paralogs exhibit low affinity for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this