Assessing compliance with national quality measures to improve colorectal cancer care at the VA

Amanda V. Hayman, Eric T. Chang, Robert E. Molokie, Lyn Sue Kahng, Jay B. Prystowsky, David J. Bentrem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Quality and Performance's July 2009 report detailed the quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care on the basis of 10 quality indicators (QIs). Of 21 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), the authors' VISN ranked last or near last on more than half of the QIs. The aim of this study was to compare a national-level assessment of performance with an institutional-level clinical review. Methods: The authors reabstracted all patients seen at surgical hospitals within their VISN during the time period of the Office of Quality and Performance report and reanalyzed their performance on the 10 QIs. A number of quality improvement efforts were also implemented to further boost performance, including the creation of a computerized patient record system CRC order set and quarterly surveillance meetings. Results: After reanalysis of the VISN's QI performance for CRC patients during the time period of the OQP report, the VISN performed 18% better than reported and 2% better than the national average. Since that time, a multidisciplinary CRC committee has implemented quality improvement measures that have further improved QI performance. Conclusions: There is variability between administrative quality assessments and clinically abstracted data. Care must be taken when analyzing QIs at the national level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)572-576
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume200
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

Veterans
Colorectal Neoplasms
Quality Improvement
United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Keywords

  • Cancer surveillance
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Quality improvement
  • Veterans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Hayman, Amanda V. ; Chang, Eric T. ; Molokie, Robert E. ; Kahng, Lyn Sue ; Prystowsky, Jay B. ; Bentrem, David J. / Assessing compliance with national quality measures to improve colorectal cancer care at the VA. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 200, No. 5. pp. 572-576.
@article{090898acafbc41d684b5239c00cfd037,
title = "Assessing compliance with national quality measures to improve colorectal cancer care at the VA",
abstract = "Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Quality and Performance's July 2009 report detailed the quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care on the basis of 10 quality indicators (QIs). Of 21 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), the authors' VISN ranked last or near last on more than half of the QIs. The aim of this study was to compare a national-level assessment of performance with an institutional-level clinical review. Methods: The authors reabstracted all patients seen at surgical hospitals within their VISN during the time period of the Office of Quality and Performance report and reanalyzed their performance on the 10 QIs. A number of quality improvement efforts were also implemented to further boost performance, including the creation of a computerized patient record system CRC order set and quarterly surveillance meetings. Results: After reanalysis of the VISN's QI performance for CRC patients during the time period of the OQP report, the VISN performed 18{\%} better than reported and 2{\%} better than the national average. Since that time, a multidisciplinary CRC committee has implemented quality improvement measures that have further improved QI performance. Conclusions: There is variability between administrative quality assessments and clinically abstracted data. Care must be taken when analyzing QIs at the national level.",
keywords = "Cancer surveillance, Colorectal cancer, Quality improvement, Veterans",
author = "Hayman, {Amanda V.} and Chang, {Eric T.} and Molokie, {Robert E.} and Kahng, {Lyn Sue} and Prystowsky, {Jay B.} and Bentrem, {David J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "200",
pages = "572--576",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Assessing compliance with national quality measures to improve colorectal cancer care at the VA. / Hayman, Amanda V.; Chang, Eric T.; Molokie, Robert E.; Kahng, Lyn Sue; Prystowsky, Jay B.; Bentrem, David J.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 200, No. 5, 01.11.2010, p. 572-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing compliance with national quality measures to improve colorectal cancer care at the VA

AU - Hayman, Amanda V.

AU - Chang, Eric T.

AU - Molokie, Robert E.

AU - Kahng, Lyn Sue

AU - Prystowsky, Jay B.

AU - Bentrem, David J.

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Quality and Performance's July 2009 report detailed the quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care on the basis of 10 quality indicators (QIs). Of 21 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), the authors' VISN ranked last or near last on more than half of the QIs. The aim of this study was to compare a national-level assessment of performance with an institutional-level clinical review. Methods: The authors reabstracted all patients seen at surgical hospitals within their VISN during the time period of the Office of Quality and Performance report and reanalyzed their performance on the 10 QIs. A number of quality improvement efforts were also implemented to further boost performance, including the creation of a computerized patient record system CRC order set and quarterly surveillance meetings. Results: After reanalysis of the VISN's QI performance for CRC patients during the time period of the OQP report, the VISN performed 18% better than reported and 2% better than the national average. Since that time, a multidisciplinary CRC committee has implemented quality improvement measures that have further improved QI performance. Conclusions: There is variability between administrative quality assessments and clinically abstracted data. Care must be taken when analyzing QIs at the national level.

AB - Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Quality and Performance's July 2009 report detailed the quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care on the basis of 10 quality indicators (QIs). Of 21 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), the authors' VISN ranked last or near last on more than half of the QIs. The aim of this study was to compare a national-level assessment of performance with an institutional-level clinical review. Methods: The authors reabstracted all patients seen at surgical hospitals within their VISN during the time period of the Office of Quality and Performance report and reanalyzed their performance on the 10 QIs. A number of quality improvement efforts were also implemented to further boost performance, including the creation of a computerized patient record system CRC order set and quarterly surveillance meetings. Results: After reanalysis of the VISN's QI performance for CRC patients during the time period of the OQP report, the VISN performed 18% better than reported and 2% better than the national average. Since that time, a multidisciplinary CRC committee has implemented quality improvement measures that have further improved QI performance. Conclusions: There is variability between administrative quality assessments and clinically abstracted data. Care must be taken when analyzing QIs at the national level.

KW - Cancer surveillance

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Veterans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149326777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149326777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 21056130

AN - SCOPUS:78149326777

VL - 200

SP - 572

EP - 576

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 5

ER -