Assessing patient evaluation skills: A structured versus traditional approach

D. A. Darosa, J. Mazur, J. Markus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of the study on which this article is based was to determine differences in interviewing skills between third-year medical students who were provided structured, evaluative feedback and those assessed via traditional feedback methods. Experimental group students received a written assessment for every orthopedic hospital patient worked up, while the control group received traditional assessment feedback. Comparison measures were made based on student performance on a simulated patient examination. Results indicated that students who were provided structured feedback scored significantly higher (p <.05) than those assessed by traditional assessment means.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)472-475
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Medical Education
Volume57
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing patient evaluation skills: A structured versus traditional approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this