TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of the Cytoprotective Effects of High-Dose Valproic Acid Compared to a Clinically Used Lower Dose
AU - Bhatti, Umar F.
AU - Remmer, Henriette
AU - Williams, Aaron M.
AU - Biesterveld, Ben E.
AU - Russo, Rachel
AU - Wakam, Glenn
AU - Kemp, Michael
AU - Tagett, Rebecca
AU - Liu, Baoling
AU - Li, Yongqing
AU - Alam, Hasan B.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the personnel and support staff at the Alam lab at the University of Michigan, the MS Bioworks LLC for the experimental processing of the proteomics samples, and the Bioinformatics Core of the University of Michigan Medical School's Biomedical Research Core Facilities for RNA sequencing and analysis. Research grant from the Office of Naval Research ( N000141310071) to HBA
Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the personnel and support staff at the Alam lab at the University of Michigan, the MS Bioworks LLC for the experimental processing of the proteomics samples, and the Bioinformatics Core of the University of Michigan Medical School's Biomedical Research Core Facilities for RNA sequencing and analysis. Research grant from the Office of Naval Research (N000141310071) to HBA, All authors declare that they have no significant competing financial, professional, or personal interests that might have influenced the performance or presentation of the work described in this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Objective: Valproic acid (VPA) treatment improves survival in animal models of injuries on doses higher than those allowed by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We investigated the proteomic alterations induced by a single high-dose (140mg/kg) of VPA (VPA140) compared to the FDA-approved dose of 30mg/kg (VPA30) in healthy humans. We also describe the proteomic and transcriptomic changes induced by VPA140 in an injured patient. We hypothesized that VPA140 would induce cytoprotective changes in the study participants. Methods: Serum samples were obtained from healthy subjects randomized to two groups; VPA140 and VPA30 at 3 timepoints: 0h(baseline), 2h, and 24h following infusion(n = 3/group). Samples were also obtained from an injured patient that received VPA140 at 0h, 6h and 24h following infusion. Proteomic analyses were performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and transcriptomic analysis was performed using RNA-sequencing. Differentially expressed (DE) proteins and genes were identified for functional annotation and pathway analysis using iPathwayGuide and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), respectively. Results: For healthy individuals, a dose comparison was performed between VPA140 and VPA30 groups at 2 and 24 h. Functional annotation showed that top biological processes in VPA140 versus VPA30 analysis at 2 h included regulation of fatty acid (P = 0.002) and ATP biosynthesis (P = 0.007), response to hypoxia (P = 0.017), cell polarity regulation (P = 0.031), and sequestration of calcium ions (P = 0.031). Top processes at 24 h in VPA140 versus VPA30 analysis included amino acid metabolism (P = 0.023), collagen catabolism (P = 0.023), and regulation of protein breakdown (P = 0.023). In the injured patient, annotation of the DE proteins in the serum showed that top biological processes at 2 h included neutrophil chemotaxis (P = 0.002), regulation of cellular response to heat (P = 0.008), regulation of oxidative stress (P = 0.008) and regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway (P = 0.008). Top biological processes in the injured patient at 24 h included autophagy (P = 0.01), glycolysis (P = 0.01), regulation of apoptosis (P = 0.01) and neuron apoptotic processes (P = 0.02). Conclusions: VPA140 induces cytoprotective changes in human proteome not observed in VPA30. These changes may be responsible for its protective effects in response to injuries.
AB - Objective: Valproic acid (VPA) treatment improves survival in animal models of injuries on doses higher than those allowed by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We investigated the proteomic alterations induced by a single high-dose (140mg/kg) of VPA (VPA140) compared to the FDA-approved dose of 30mg/kg (VPA30) in healthy humans. We also describe the proteomic and transcriptomic changes induced by VPA140 in an injured patient. We hypothesized that VPA140 would induce cytoprotective changes in the study participants. Methods: Serum samples were obtained from healthy subjects randomized to two groups; VPA140 and VPA30 at 3 timepoints: 0h(baseline), 2h, and 24h following infusion(n = 3/group). Samples were also obtained from an injured patient that received VPA140 at 0h, 6h and 24h following infusion. Proteomic analyses were performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and transcriptomic analysis was performed using RNA-sequencing. Differentially expressed (DE) proteins and genes were identified for functional annotation and pathway analysis using iPathwayGuide and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), respectively. Results: For healthy individuals, a dose comparison was performed between VPA140 and VPA30 groups at 2 and 24 h. Functional annotation showed that top biological processes in VPA140 versus VPA30 analysis at 2 h included regulation of fatty acid (P = 0.002) and ATP biosynthesis (P = 0.007), response to hypoxia (P = 0.017), cell polarity regulation (P = 0.031), and sequestration of calcium ions (P = 0.031). Top processes at 24 h in VPA140 versus VPA30 analysis included amino acid metabolism (P = 0.023), collagen catabolism (P = 0.023), and regulation of protein breakdown (P = 0.023). In the injured patient, annotation of the DE proteins in the serum showed that top biological processes at 2 h included neutrophil chemotaxis (P = 0.002), regulation of cellular response to heat (P = 0.008), regulation of oxidative stress (P = 0.008) and regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway (P = 0.008). Top biological processes in the injured patient at 24 h included autophagy (P = 0.01), glycolysis (P = 0.01), regulation of apoptosis (P = 0.01) and neuron apoptotic processes (P = 0.02). Conclusions: VPA140 induces cytoprotective changes in human proteome not observed in VPA30. These changes may be responsible for its protective effects in response to injuries.
KW - Hemorrhagic shock
KW - Histone deacetylase inhibitors
KW - Traumatic brain injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105567565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105567565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 33991999
AN - SCOPUS:85105567565
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 266
SP - 125
EP - 141
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -