Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations

Richard S. Matulewicz, David D. Odell, Jeanette W. Chung, Kristen A. Ban, Anthony D. Yang, Karl Y. Bilimoria*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Background Residents are often required to balance whether to adhere to duty hour policies or violate them to care for patients and obtain educational experiences. Little is known about why residents violate duty hour policies and whether there is a relationship between how often residents violate duty hours and concerns about patient safety. Our objective was to assess the association between resident duty hour violations and resident concerns about patient safety. Study Design We analyzed survey data collected from surgery residents who completed the 2015 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, excluding those in the Flexible Policy arm of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial. Perceptions of how duty hour restrictions affect patient safety were dichotomized as either “positive/neutral” or “negative.” Resident duty hour violations in a typical month were separated as “frequently” (≥3 times) or “infrequently” (<3 times). Rates were compared and regression models were used to examine the association between negative perceptions and duty hour violations, adjusting for resident and program-level covariates. Results Overall, 25.3% of trainees under current policies perceived that current ACGME duty hour policies negatively affected patient safety. This negative perception increased with PGY level (PGY1: 18.5%, PGY2 to 3: 22.6%, PGY4 to 5: 32.0%; p < 0.001). Residents with negative perceptions more often reported frequent duty violations (positive/neutral: 20.0% vs negative: 32.7%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, a negative perception of how duty hour policies affect patient safety was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of frequent duty hour violations among all trainees grouped together (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.60–2.22), and separately for interns (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.70–3.93), junior (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.22–2.16), and senior residents (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.54–2.58). Conclusions Trainees who reported perceiving negative effects of duty hour policies on patient safety were more likely to report frequent duty hour violations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-117.e4
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this