Association of a Novel Point Mutation (C159G) of the CTLA4 Gene with Type 1 Diabetes in West Africans but not in Chinese

Douglas Osei-Hyiaman*, Lifang Hou, Ren Zhiyin, Zhang Zhiming, Haiquin Yu, Abena Agyeiwaa Amankwah, Shoji Harada

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Here, we report on the detection of a novel point mutation of the CTLA4 gene at nucleotide position 159 (C→G) leading to amino acid substitution at position 53 (I→M), as well as its association with type 1 diabetes in two ethnically distinct populations. Subjects included 182 unrelated type 1 diabetes children and 201 control subjects from Ghana, West Africa. The Chinese study population consisted of 350 type 1 diabetic children and 420 healthy control subjects from central China. Polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism and sequence analysis were used to screen for polymorphisms in the CTLA4 gene. CTLAC 49 (A→G) mutation conferred a risk of type 1 diabetes in the Chinese children (odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.58-2.0), but not in the West African children (1.17, 0.84-1.64). On the other hand, the novel CTLA4 159 (C→G) mutation conferred a risk of type 1 diabetes in the West African children (2.1, 1.54-2.86), but not in the Chinese type 1 diabetic children. The novel CTLA4 gene polymorphism at nucleotide position 159 significantly associated with type 1 diabetes in West Africans, but not in Chinese. On the other hand, the CTLA4 gene polymorphism at nucleotide position 49 significantly associated with type 1 diabetes in Chinese, but not in West Africans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2169-2171
Number of pages3
JournalDiabetes
Volume50
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of a Novel Point Mutation (C159G) of the CTLA4 Gene with Type 1 Diabetes in West Africans but not in Chinese'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this