Association of operative time and approach on postoperative complications for esophagectomy

Ryan C. Jacobs*, Catherine S. Valukas, Maxime A. Visa, Charles D. Logan, Joe M. Feinglass, Kalvin C. Lung, Diego M. Avella Patino, Samuel Suk Kim, Ankit Bharat, David Duston Odell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with decreased postoperative complications compared with open esophagectomy. However, the risks of complications for minimally invasive esophagectomy compared with open esophagectomy may be affected by operative time. The objectives of this study are to (1) compare the incidence of postoperative complications for minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy and (2) evaluate the association of postoperative complications on operative approach and operative time. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent an esophagectomy in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Data File was performed from 2016 to 2020. For analysis, minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy were stratified into tertiles of operative time. A bivariate analysis of postoperative complications comparing minimally invasive esophagectomy with open esophagectomy was performed. Multivariable Poisson regression models were estimated evaluating the association of the likelihood of postoperative complications with operative approach and operative time. Results: In total, 8,574 patients who underwent esophagectomy were included: 5,369 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy, and 3,205 patients underwent open esophagectomy. Median operative time was 402 minutes for minimally invasive esophagectomy and 321 minutes for open esophagectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality was lower in the minimally invasive esophagectomy group than the open esophagectomy group within the same tertiles of operative time. When we compared patients who underwent short open esophagectomy with those who underwent long minimally invasive esophagectomy, there were no significant differences in complications. Conclusion: There is no significant association of postoperative complications for short open esophagectomy compared with long minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients should be selected for minimally invasive esophagectomy when there is appropriate surgeon experience and hospital resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1106-1114
Number of pages9
JournalSurgery (United States)
Volume176
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of operative time and approach on postoperative complications for esophagectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this