TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of State Insurance Mandates for Fertility Treatment with Multiple Embryo Transfer after Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
AU - Bedrick, Bronwyn S.
AU - Nickel, Katelin B.
AU - Riley, Joan K.
AU - Jain, Tarun
AU - Jungheim, Emily S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/1/27
Y1 - 2023/1/27
N2 - Importance: Multiple gestation is one of the biggest risks after in vitro fertilization (IVF), largely due to multiple embryo transfer (MET). Single embryo transfer (SET) uptake has increased over time and has been attributed to various factors, such as mandated insurance coverage for IVF and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Objective: To investigate whether mandates for IVF insurance coverage are associated with decreased use of MET after PGT-A. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted using data on embryo transfers reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016. Data were analyzed from January to October 2021. Exposures: State-mandated coverage for fertility treatment and type of cycle transfer performed (PGT-A, untested fresh, and untested frozen). Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of MET compared with SET, live birth, and live birth of multiples. Results: There were 110843 embryo transfers (mean [SD] patient age, 34.0 [4.5] years; 5520 individuals identified as African American [5.0%], 10035 as Asian [9.0%], 5425 as Hispanic [4.9%], 45561 as White [41.1%], and 44302 as other or unknown race or ethnicity [40.0%]); 17650 transfers used embryos that underwent PGT-A. Overall, among transferred embryos that had PGT-A, there were 9712 live births (55.0%). The odds of live birth were 70% higher with MET vs SET after frozen embryo transfer with PGT-A (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.78), but the risk of multiples was 5 times higher (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 5.22-5.44). The odds of MET in cycles with PGT-A in states with insurance mandates were 24% lower than in states without mandates (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that despite the promise of using SET with PGT-A, MET after PGT-A was not uncommon. This practice was more common in states without insurance mandates and was associated with a high risk of multiples.
AB - Importance: Multiple gestation is one of the biggest risks after in vitro fertilization (IVF), largely due to multiple embryo transfer (MET). Single embryo transfer (SET) uptake has increased over time and has been attributed to various factors, such as mandated insurance coverage for IVF and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Objective: To investigate whether mandates for IVF insurance coverage are associated with decreased use of MET after PGT-A. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted using data on embryo transfers reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016. Data were analyzed from January to October 2021. Exposures: State-mandated coverage for fertility treatment and type of cycle transfer performed (PGT-A, untested fresh, and untested frozen). Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of MET compared with SET, live birth, and live birth of multiples. Results: There were 110843 embryo transfers (mean [SD] patient age, 34.0 [4.5] years; 5520 individuals identified as African American [5.0%], 10035 as Asian [9.0%], 5425 as Hispanic [4.9%], 45561 as White [41.1%], and 44302 as other or unknown race or ethnicity [40.0%]); 17650 transfers used embryos that underwent PGT-A. Overall, among transferred embryos that had PGT-A, there were 9712 live births (55.0%). The odds of live birth were 70% higher with MET vs SET after frozen embryo transfer with PGT-A (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.78), but the risk of multiples was 5 times higher (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 5.22-5.44). The odds of MET in cycles with PGT-A in states with insurance mandates were 24% lower than in states without mandates (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that despite the promise of using SET with PGT-A, MET after PGT-A was not uncommon. This practice was more common in states without insurance mandates and was associated with a high risk of multiples.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147091119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147091119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51739
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51739
M3 - Article
C2 - 36705925
AN - SCOPUS:85147091119
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 6
SP - E2251739
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
IS - 1
ER -