Attention in individuals with aphasia

Performance on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test – 2nd edition

Jaime B. Lee, Masha Kocherginsky, Leora R Cherney*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Studies suggest that individuals with aphasia present with impairments in attention. However, most research has been conducted with small sample sizes using experimental protocols that lack established psychometric properties. We examined the attention performance of 114 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia using a standardised, norm-referenced assessment of attention, the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II (CPT-II; Conners, C. K. (2000). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc). Participants completed the CPT-II and the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp). As a group, variable performance on selected CPT-II measures was observed. Participants demonstrated impairments on omissions (48.2%) and hit reaction time (67.5%), with 11.4% demonstrating atypically slow performance and over half of the sample (56.1%) performing atypically fast. The Confidence Index, a summary score, was also within the impaired range for the majority of participants. However, there were also measures in which a greater percentage of participants demonstrated performance within normal limits. Using the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ) as a measure of severity, there was significantly worse performance in participants with more severe (AQ < 50) compared to less severe (AQ ≥ 50) aphasia. No significant differences in attention were identified between participants with fluent versus non-fluent aphasia. The CPT-II is a feasible measure for persons with aphasia, which may assist in identifying attention performance deficits that potentially affect language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalNeuropsychological rehabilitation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 20 2018

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Carnitine O-Palmitoyltransferase
Performance Test
Psychometrics
Sample Size
Reaction Time
Language
Stroke
Health

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • Assessment
  • Attention
  • Cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{a242ad058c994d61b552bb42d24d3fdf,
title = "Attention in individuals with aphasia: Performance on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test – 2nd edition",
abstract = "Studies suggest that individuals with aphasia present with impairments in attention. However, most research has been conducted with small sample sizes using experimental protocols that lack established psychometric properties. We examined the attention performance of 114 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia using a standardised, norm-referenced assessment of attention, the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II (CPT-II; Conners, C. K. (2000). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc). Participants completed the CPT-II and the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp). As a group, variable performance on selected CPT-II measures was observed. Participants demonstrated impairments on omissions (48.2{\%}) and hit reaction time (67.5{\%}), with 11.4{\%} demonstrating atypically slow performance and over half of the sample (56.1{\%}) performing atypically fast. The Confidence Index, a summary score, was also within the impaired range for the majority of participants. However, there were also measures in which a greater percentage of participants demonstrated performance within normal limits. Using the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ) as a measure of severity, there was significantly worse performance in participants with more severe (AQ < 50) compared to less severe (AQ ≥ 50) aphasia. No significant differences in attention were identified between participants with fluent versus non-fluent aphasia. The CPT-II is a feasible measure for persons with aphasia, which may assist in identifying attention performance deficits that potentially affect language.",
keywords = "Aphasia, Assessment, Attention, Cognition",
author = "Lee, {Jaime B.} and Masha Kocherginsky and Cherney, {Leora R}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention in individuals with aphasia

T2 - Performance on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test – 2nd edition

AU - Lee, Jaime B.

AU - Kocherginsky, Masha

AU - Cherney, Leora R

PY - 2018/4/20

Y1 - 2018/4/20

N2 - Studies suggest that individuals with aphasia present with impairments in attention. However, most research has been conducted with small sample sizes using experimental protocols that lack established psychometric properties. We examined the attention performance of 114 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia using a standardised, norm-referenced assessment of attention, the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II (CPT-II; Conners, C. K. (2000). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc). Participants completed the CPT-II and the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp). As a group, variable performance on selected CPT-II measures was observed. Participants demonstrated impairments on omissions (48.2%) and hit reaction time (67.5%), with 11.4% demonstrating atypically slow performance and over half of the sample (56.1%) performing atypically fast. The Confidence Index, a summary score, was also within the impaired range for the majority of participants. However, there were also measures in which a greater percentage of participants demonstrated performance within normal limits. Using the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ) as a measure of severity, there was significantly worse performance in participants with more severe (AQ < 50) compared to less severe (AQ ≥ 50) aphasia. No significant differences in attention were identified between participants with fluent versus non-fluent aphasia. The CPT-II is a feasible measure for persons with aphasia, which may assist in identifying attention performance deficits that potentially affect language.

AB - Studies suggest that individuals with aphasia present with impairments in attention. However, most research has been conducted with small sample sizes using experimental protocols that lack established psychometric properties. We examined the attention performance of 114 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia using a standardised, norm-referenced assessment of attention, the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II (CPT-II; Conners, C. K. (2000). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test II. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc). Participants completed the CPT-II and the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp). As a group, variable performance on selected CPT-II measures was observed. Participants demonstrated impairments on omissions (48.2%) and hit reaction time (67.5%), with 11.4% demonstrating atypically slow performance and over half of the sample (56.1%) performing atypically fast. The Confidence Index, a summary score, was also within the impaired range for the majority of participants. However, there were also measures in which a greater percentage of participants demonstrated performance within normal limits. Using the WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ) as a measure of severity, there was significantly worse performance in participants with more severe (AQ < 50) compared to less severe (AQ ≥ 50) aphasia. No significant differences in attention were identified between participants with fluent versus non-fluent aphasia. The CPT-II is a feasible measure for persons with aphasia, which may assist in identifying attention performance deficits that potentially affect language.

KW - Aphasia

KW - Assessment

KW - Attention

KW - Cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045741280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045741280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852

DO - 10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

ER -