Attentional training of the appetitive motivation system: Effects on sensation seeking preferences and reward-based behavior

Paul W. Goetz, Michael D. Robinson, Brian P. Meier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motivation is seen to guide selective attention in favor of motivation-consistent stimuli. However, such links may be bi-directional in nature, such that selective attention processes may also bias and determine one's motivational state. In the present study, we examined the latter direction of influence by randomly assigning participants to one of two conditions designed to train selective attention either toward or away from rewarding word stimuli. The effects of this manipulation were examined in terms of approach-related intentions, emotional state, and reward-reactive behavior. It was found that the selective attention manipulation influenced preferences and behavior, but not conscious emotional state. Findings are discussed in relation to implications for motivation, cognition, and emotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-126
Number of pages7
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

Reward
Motivation
Cognition
Emotions

Keywords

  • Appetitive motivation
  • Attention
  • Behavior
  • Emotion
  • Reward

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Goetz, Paul W. ; Robinson, Michael D. ; Meier, Brian P. / Attentional training of the appetitive motivation system : Effects on sensation seeking preferences and reward-based behavior. In: Motivation and Emotion. 2008 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 120-126.
@article{282d8b9dab644e94823f18cb27e215af,
title = "Attentional training of the appetitive motivation system: Effects on sensation seeking preferences and reward-based behavior",
abstract = "Motivation is seen to guide selective attention in favor of motivation-consistent stimuli. However, such links may be bi-directional in nature, such that selective attention processes may also bias and determine one's motivational state. In the present study, we examined the latter direction of influence by randomly assigning participants to one of two conditions designed to train selective attention either toward or away from rewarding word stimuli. The effects of this manipulation were examined in terms of approach-related intentions, emotional state, and reward-reactive behavior. It was found that the selective attention manipulation influenced preferences and behavior, but not conscious emotional state. Findings are discussed in relation to implications for motivation, cognition, and emotion.",
keywords = "Appetitive motivation, Attention, Behavior, Emotion, Reward",
author = "Goetz, {Paul W.} and Robinson, {Michael D.} and Meier, {Brian P.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-008-9091-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "120--126",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Attentional training of the appetitive motivation system : Effects on sensation seeking preferences and reward-based behavior. / Goetz, Paul W.; Robinson, Michael D.; Meier, Brian P.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 120-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attentional training of the appetitive motivation system

T2 - Effects on sensation seeking preferences and reward-based behavior

AU - Goetz, Paul W.

AU - Robinson, Michael D.

AU - Meier, Brian P.

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - Motivation is seen to guide selective attention in favor of motivation-consistent stimuli. However, such links may be bi-directional in nature, such that selective attention processes may also bias and determine one's motivational state. In the present study, we examined the latter direction of influence by randomly assigning participants to one of two conditions designed to train selective attention either toward or away from rewarding word stimuli. The effects of this manipulation were examined in terms of approach-related intentions, emotional state, and reward-reactive behavior. It was found that the selective attention manipulation influenced preferences and behavior, but not conscious emotional state. Findings are discussed in relation to implications for motivation, cognition, and emotion.

AB - Motivation is seen to guide selective attention in favor of motivation-consistent stimuli. However, such links may be bi-directional in nature, such that selective attention processes may also bias and determine one's motivational state. In the present study, we examined the latter direction of influence by randomly assigning participants to one of two conditions designed to train selective attention either toward or away from rewarding word stimuli. The effects of this manipulation were examined in terms of approach-related intentions, emotional state, and reward-reactive behavior. It was found that the selective attention manipulation influenced preferences and behavior, but not conscious emotional state. Findings are discussed in relation to implications for motivation, cognition, and emotion.

KW - Appetitive motivation

KW - Attention

KW - Behavior

KW - Emotion

KW - Reward

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43949085680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43949085680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-008-9091-3

DO - 10.1007/s11031-008-9091-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:43949085680

VL - 32

SP - 120

EP - 126

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 2

ER -