Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors

Bruce L. Lambert*, William Galanter, King Lup Liu, Suzanne Falck, Gordon Schiff, Christine Rash-Foanio, Kelly Schmidt, Neeha Shrestha, Allen J. Vaida, Michael J. Gaunt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background To assess the specificity of an algorithm designed to detect look-alike/sound-alike (LASA) medication prescribing errors in electronic health record (EHR) data. Setting Urban, academic medical centre, comprising a 495-bed hospital and outpatient clinic running on the Cerner EHR. We extracted 8 years of medication orders and diagnostic claims. We licensed a database of medication indications, refined it and merged it with the medication data. We developed an algorithm that triggered for LASA errors based on name similarity, the frequency with which a patient received a medication and whether the medication was justified by a diagnostic claim. We stratified triggers by similarity. Two clinicians reviewed a sample of charts for the presence of a true error, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. We computed specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and yield. Results The algorithm analysed 488 481 orders and generated 2404 triggers (0.5% rate). Clinicians reviewed 506 cases and confirmed the presence of 61 errors, for an overall PPV of 12.1% (95% CI 10.7% to 13.5%). It was not possible to measure sensitivity or the false-negative rate. The specificity of the algorithm varied as a function of name similarity and whether the intended and dispensed drugs shared the same route of administration. Conclusion Automated detection of LASA medication errors is feasible and can reveal errors not currently detected by other means. Real-time error detection is not possible with the current system, the main barrier being the real-time availability of accurate diagnostic information. Further development should replicate this analysis in other health systems and on a larger set of medications and should decrease clinician time spent reviewing false-positive triggers by increasing specificity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)908-915
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Keywords

  • decision support, computerized
  • medication safety
  • patient safety
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lambert, B. L., Galanter, W., Liu, K. L., Falck, S., Schiff, G., Rash-Foanio, C., Schmidt, K., Shrestha, N., Vaida, A. J., & Gaunt, M. J. (2019). Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors. BMJ Quality and Safety, 28(11), 908-915. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009420