TY - JOUR
T1 - Becoming a Parent During Cardiovascular Training
AU - Oliveros, Estefania
AU - Burgess, Sonya
AU - Nadella, Neelima
AU - Davidson, Laura
AU - Brailovsky, Yevgeniy
AU - Reza, Nosheen
AU - Squeri, Erika
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - DeFaria Yeh, Doreen
AU - Park, Ki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2022/5/31
Y1 - 2022/5/31
N2 - Background: Specialty training in cardiovascular diseases is consistently perceived to have adverse job conditions and interfere with family life. There is a dearth of universal workforce support for trainees who become parents during training. Objectives: This study sought to identify parental policies across cardiovascular training programs internationally. Methods: An Internet-based international survey study available from August 2020 to October 2020 was sent via social media. The survey was administered 1 time and anonymously. Participants shared experiences regarding parental benefits/policies and perception of barriers for trainees. Participants were divided into 3 groups: training program directors, trainees pregnant during cardiology fellowship, and trainees not pregnant during training. Results: A total of 417 replies were received from physicians, including 47 responses (11.3%) from training program directors, 146 responses (35%) from current or former trainees pregnant during cardiology training, and 224 responses (53.7%) from current or former trainees that were not pregnant during cardiology training. Among trainees, 280 (67.1%) were parents during training. Family benefits and policies were not uniformly available across institutions, and knowledge regarding the existence of such policies was low. Average parental leave ranged from 1 to 2 months in the United States compared with >4 months outside the United States, and in all countries, paternity leave was uncommon (only 11 participants [2.6%]). Coverage during family leave was primarily provided by peers (n = 184 [44.1%]), and 168 (91.3%) were without additional monetary or time compensation. Conclusions: This is the first international survey evaluating and comparing parental benefits and policies among cardiovascular training programs. There is great variability among institutions, highlighting disparities in real-world experiences.
AB - Background: Specialty training in cardiovascular diseases is consistently perceived to have adverse job conditions and interfere with family life. There is a dearth of universal workforce support for trainees who become parents during training. Objectives: This study sought to identify parental policies across cardiovascular training programs internationally. Methods: An Internet-based international survey study available from August 2020 to October 2020 was sent via social media. The survey was administered 1 time and anonymously. Participants shared experiences regarding parental benefits/policies and perception of barriers for trainees. Participants were divided into 3 groups: training program directors, trainees pregnant during cardiology fellowship, and trainees not pregnant during training. Results: A total of 417 replies were received from physicians, including 47 responses (11.3%) from training program directors, 146 responses (35%) from current or former trainees pregnant during cardiology training, and 224 responses (53.7%) from current or former trainees that were not pregnant during cardiology training. Among trainees, 280 (67.1%) were parents during training. Family benefits and policies were not uniformly available across institutions, and knowledge regarding the existence of such policies was low. Average parental leave ranged from 1 to 2 months in the United States compared with >4 months outside the United States, and in all countries, paternity leave was uncommon (only 11 participants [2.6%]). Coverage during family leave was primarily provided by peers (n = 184 [44.1%]), and 168 (91.3%) were without additional monetary or time compensation. Conclusions: This is the first international survey evaluating and comparing parental benefits and policies among cardiovascular training programs. There is great variability among institutions, highlighting disparities in real-world experiences.
KW - cardiovascular fellowship
KW - parenting
KW - policy
KW - pregnancy
KW - training
KW - women in cardiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130329863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130329863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.371
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.371
M3 - Article
C2 - 35618349
AN - SCOPUS:85130329863
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 79
SP - 2119
EP - 2126
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 21
ER -