Behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies delivered via coached apps for depression: Pilot trial

Colleen Stiles-Shields*, Enid Montague, Mary J. Kwasny, David C. Mohr

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Depression is common in primary care settings, but barriers prevent many primary care patients from initiating treatment. Smartphone apps stand as a possible means to overcome such barriers. However, there is limited evidence to understand the use and efficacy of these apps. The purpose of the current study was to pilot an evaluation of the usage and efficacy of apps for depression based upon behavioral or cognitive intervention skills, compared to a wait-list control. Thirty adults with depression were randomized to the use of either a behavioral app (Boost Me) or a cognitive app (Thought Challenger) or to a wait-list control. Boost Me and Thought Challenger participants received 6 weeks of the respective intervention along with weekly coaching sessions, with a 4-week follow-up period; wait-list control participants received no interventions for 10 weeks. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to examine depression over time and across treatment groups; t tests compared app usage across groups. Depression scores changed significantly over time (p > .001), with group differences occurring between Thought Challenger and wait-list control participants (p = .03). Boost Me was used significantly more than was Thought Challenger (p = .02); however, there was no evidence to suggest correlations between usage and changes in depression (ps > .05). The present study provides initial support that intervention strategies for depression delivered via apps with human support can impact symptoms and may promote continued use over 6 weeks. This pilot also demonstrates the feasibility of future research regarding the delivery of behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies via apps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-238
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Services
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Analysis of Variance
Therapeutics
Mentoring
Smartphone

Keywords

  • Access barriers
  • Apps
  • Behavioral activation
  • Cognitive therapy
  • Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{6596f21939a447c39baf7b6aa0331400,
title = "Behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies delivered via coached apps for depression: Pilot trial",
abstract = "Depression is common in primary care settings, but barriers prevent many primary care patients from initiating treatment. Smartphone apps stand as a possible means to overcome such barriers. However, there is limited evidence to understand the use and efficacy of these apps. The purpose of the current study was to pilot an evaluation of the usage and efficacy of apps for depression based upon behavioral or cognitive intervention skills, compared to a wait-list control. Thirty adults with depression were randomized to the use of either a behavioral app (Boost Me) or a cognitive app (Thought Challenger) or to a wait-list control. Boost Me and Thought Challenger participants received 6 weeks of the respective intervention along with weekly coaching sessions, with a 4-week follow-up period; wait-list control participants received no interventions for 10 weeks. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to examine depression over time and across treatment groups; t tests compared app usage across groups. Depression scores changed significantly over time (p > .001), with group differences occurring between Thought Challenger and wait-list control participants (p = .03). Boost Me was used significantly more than was Thought Challenger (p = .02); however, there was no evidence to suggest correlations between usage and changes in depression (ps > .05). The present study provides initial support that intervention strategies for depression delivered via apps with human support can impact symptoms and may promote continued use over 6 weeks. This pilot also demonstrates the feasibility of future research regarding the delivery of behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies via apps.",
keywords = "Access barriers, Apps, Behavioral activation, Cognitive therapy, Depression",
author = "Colleen Stiles-Shields and Enid Montague and Kwasny, {Mary J.} and Mohr, {David C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/ser0000261",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "233--238",
journal = "Psychological Services",
issn = "1541-1559",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies delivered via coached apps for depression : Pilot trial. / Stiles-Shields, Colleen; Montague, Enid; Kwasny, Mary J.; Mohr, David C.

In: Psychological Services, Vol. 16, No. 2, 05.2019, p. 233-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies delivered via coached apps for depression

T2 - Pilot trial

AU - Stiles-Shields, Colleen

AU - Montague, Enid

AU - Kwasny, Mary J.

AU - Mohr, David C.

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Depression is common in primary care settings, but barriers prevent many primary care patients from initiating treatment. Smartphone apps stand as a possible means to overcome such barriers. However, there is limited evidence to understand the use and efficacy of these apps. The purpose of the current study was to pilot an evaluation of the usage and efficacy of apps for depression based upon behavioral or cognitive intervention skills, compared to a wait-list control. Thirty adults with depression were randomized to the use of either a behavioral app (Boost Me) or a cognitive app (Thought Challenger) or to a wait-list control. Boost Me and Thought Challenger participants received 6 weeks of the respective intervention along with weekly coaching sessions, with a 4-week follow-up period; wait-list control participants received no interventions for 10 weeks. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to examine depression over time and across treatment groups; t tests compared app usage across groups. Depression scores changed significantly over time (p > .001), with group differences occurring between Thought Challenger and wait-list control participants (p = .03). Boost Me was used significantly more than was Thought Challenger (p = .02); however, there was no evidence to suggest correlations between usage and changes in depression (ps > .05). The present study provides initial support that intervention strategies for depression delivered via apps with human support can impact symptoms and may promote continued use over 6 weeks. This pilot also demonstrates the feasibility of future research regarding the delivery of behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies via apps.

AB - Depression is common in primary care settings, but barriers prevent many primary care patients from initiating treatment. Smartphone apps stand as a possible means to overcome such barriers. However, there is limited evidence to understand the use and efficacy of these apps. The purpose of the current study was to pilot an evaluation of the usage and efficacy of apps for depression based upon behavioral or cognitive intervention skills, compared to a wait-list control. Thirty adults with depression were randomized to the use of either a behavioral app (Boost Me) or a cognitive app (Thought Challenger) or to a wait-list control. Boost Me and Thought Challenger participants received 6 weeks of the respective intervention along with weekly coaching sessions, with a 4-week follow-up period; wait-list control participants received no interventions for 10 weeks. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to examine depression over time and across treatment groups; t tests compared app usage across groups. Depression scores changed significantly over time (p > .001), with group differences occurring between Thought Challenger and wait-list control participants (p = .03). Boost Me was used significantly more than was Thought Challenger (p = .02); however, there was no evidence to suggest correlations between usage and changes in depression (ps > .05). The present study provides initial support that intervention strategies for depression delivered via apps with human support can impact symptoms and may promote continued use over 6 weeks. This pilot also demonstrates the feasibility of future research regarding the delivery of behavioral and cognitive intervention strategies via apps.

KW - Access barriers

KW - Apps

KW - Behavioral activation

KW - Cognitive therapy

KW - Depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056204205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056204205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/ser0000261

DO - 10.1037/ser0000261

M3 - Article

C2 - 30407055

AN - SCOPUS:85056204205

VL - 16

SP - 233

EP - 238

JO - Psychological Services

JF - Psychological Services

SN - 1541-1559

IS - 2

ER -